335 words • 2~4 min read

Weekly dose of TED – Hans Rosling shows the best stats you’ve ever seen

“Social progress is going ahead of economical progress” – do you believe this is really true? Note that the US is consistently richer than would be expected given its stats for infant mortality, life expectancy, etc. Our country makes the case for the need for alternative development statistics that measure more than just the dollar – there are other indicators of development that may be even more important than cash. In fact, these other metrics may be direct tradeoffs – health care requires public investment in research, preventative care, and education that will take away from overall GDP calculation. Do other countries now have it right?

“We have not seen good economic or health progress anywhere in the world without destroying the climate”. Well, that’s quite the statement – but development does require energy. Ideally, metrics of development would include economic, social, and environmental indicators, but if Rosling is right, then no country has succeeded at all three. Therefore, we all have needed development in our future. What do you think about Rosling’s recipe for development?

 


Deep-sea biologist, population/conservation geneticist, backyard farm advocate. The deep sea is Earth's last great wilderness.


Connect with SFS


  • Recent Popular Articles

    No, we didn't find the Loch Ness Monster with Apple Maps
    Collecting organisms to save their species
    The Trouble with Teacup Pigs
    My five favorite responses to the Loch Ness Debunking.
    Mermaids: The New Evidence is a Fake Documentary
    10 reasons why marine mammals aren't as cute as you think they are
    How to build a canoe from scratch on a graduate student stipend
    10 fish weirder than the fish in the 10 weirdest fish in the world list