Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Conservation Wanted – dead or alive?

Posted on September 16, 2016September 16, 2016 By Chris Parsons
Conservation

wanted

When I was an undergraduate studying conservation in the dim and distant past, we were told that the way endangered species would be saved would be to give them a financial value, and “wise use” of these species would allow them to survive. Well, that worked well, didn’t it…? The poster species of the “wise use” movement (such as elephants) are much closer to extinction today than they were decades ago.

Today there is somewhat of a rift in conservation between the “new conservation” movement and, well, the rest of conservation scientists. New conservation establishes “economic development, poverty alleviation, and corporate partnerships as surrogates or substitutes for endangered species listings, protected areas, and other mainstream conservation tools,” to quote the words of the grandfather of Conservation Biology, Michael Soulé . It could be argued that this is little more than a rebranding of the “wise use” movement although there are those that debate this.

The term “use it or lose it” was a tagline for these movements. Endangered species and habitats need to have some sort of value – to pay their way – or they will go extinct. This does make a sort of sense; species and habitats with an economic value, theoretically, will be maintained in order to maintain that value. Moreover, conservationists could, theoretically, be on a more level playing field with their opponents when arguing with policy makers, as they would be able to assign an economic and employment value to species they protect, similar to the corporations and others they are opposing.

The problem with the various conservation strategies that present nature as a resource to be exploited is that as soon as one puts a value on the killing of an endangered species or the destruction of a habitat, it will happen, and frequently – if not always – at unsustainable levels. Declining numbers of a species do little to slow down the exploitation, because if there is a market for a threatened species or its products, being rarer just makes it more valuable until the moment it goes extinct. Rarely do conservation projects have enough resources to enforce strict regulations and so overexploitation, poaching or illegal activities are often inevitable.

So rather than talking simply about the “value” of endangered species, perhaps we should be talking specifically about categorizing the “dead” value versus the “living” value – to be a bit more scientifically and politically correct, the consumptive versus the non-consumptive value. “Dead” value might include sale of species products, whilst “living” value might include ecosystem services provided by habitats, tourism value (species as a target of wildlife tourism), entertainment value (value from watching animals in zoos or on TV shows) or intrinsic or aesthetic value (for example, what the public is willing to provide in taxes to maintain the existence of species in the wild).

If conservationists talked more about the value of endangered species and habitats in terms of their living or non-consumptive value, then there would be less conflict within the conservation community over the concept of assigning economic value to species in the first place. Once a species or habitat is assigned a “dead” value, considering the nature of the world we live in, it is likely doomed to extinction.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: consumptive value ecosystem services ecotourism new conservation overexploitation poaching use it or lose it wise use movement

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Trying to debunk the aquatic ape hypothesis… or not. Or the day I tried to defend David Attenborough.
Next Post: Help crowdfund shark research: time traveling through shark skin ❯

You may also like

Conservation
Shark News Roundup: the ecology of fear, curious whale sharks, and saving the manta rays
November 16, 2010
Weekly Salvage
#IAmSeaGrant, Octopus Beats Dolphins, Deep-sea Mining, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: May 29, 2017
May 29, 2017
Conservation
Make for the Planet with Conservation X Labs and the Earth Optimism Summit!
April 11, 2017
Conservation
10 ways drones can save the ocean
June 27, 2014

Recent Popular Posts

The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!June 16, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.July 26, 2018Andrew Thaler
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown