Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

PCS Phosphate: Participation is necessary, whether or not it’s required

Posted on July 25, 2011July 25, 2011 By Bluegrass Blue Crab 3 Comments on PCS Phosphate: Participation is necessary, whether or not it’s required
Conservation

Since finding out about PCS Phosphate’s plans to build  a sulfur melting facility at the Morehead City Port, the community has been swift to organize in opposition of the plant. Some of the reaction is in genuine concern about the environmental and economic impacts of the plant, but most if it circles around the fact that by the time the first public articles were released about the plant, permits had been signed and to many, the plan seemed like a done deal. All without input or comment from the public, or even from much of the Morehead City leadership.

The permit issuers are just doing their jobs – but the situation begs a larger review of state agency activity. Many state employees feel like it would help them to collaborate with people in another agency (eg regarding mercury in the Cape Fear), and in cases like this, an approach agency-by-agency can leave out the big picture. In this case, the big picture is that PCS Phosphate has yet to do a full environmental impact statement or collect any comments on the project as a whole. Sure, 4.5 kg of hydrogen sulfide a day seems ok (air permit), and it fits with the industrial zoning of the port (zoning permit). But will the addition of emitting industries compete with the tourist industry? We have no idea. In previous cases, such as the Titan Cement case in Wilmington, this has left the company open for lawsuits that have been tied up in court for years.

Take the Titan case as an example – a poll of New Hanover County voters revealed that almost three-quarters of voters want the permitting process delayed until a full environmental and social impact review is completed. The permitting process there, as in Morehead City, began with Air Quality. Since first applying for a permit in early 2008, there has been a series of back-and-forth with the Department of Air Quality, which is now receiving input from other state agencies. Although Titan seems to be following the letter of the law, citizens and DAQ permitters have decided that they are not following the spirit of the regulation – to protect North Carolina’s citizens and environment.

As a result of the public outcry over the early air permits, concerned citizens sued Titan under the State Environmental Protection Act. The judge ruled that Titan must undergo a full environmental review. This means that no building can occur before all permits are issued.

Although the Titan case is still embroiled in legal battles and agency negotiations, it offers an early precedent for legal corporate behavior. Although the air permit, among others, is allowed to be issued before public comment or complete permitting, this is no longer an advisable strategy for the company. Changes within the state agency and legal precedent regarding full environmental review are underfoot – in ways that should send PCS Phosphate knocking on doors to garner public support, not hiding from the community.

Furthermore, even if the state weren’t re-thinking its permitting review, it’s well-established political theory that it’s not about the final product – it’s all about process. If people feel included in the process, empowered by the space to be heard by company officials, they are more likely to create a fruitful relationship between the company and the community. Regardless of how environmentally and socially reponsible the company may be, if the citizens aren’t kept in the loop along the way, animosity is fostered from day one. Regardless of what the state or a judge mandates, it is important for a company to be part of the community and should therefore be working with concerned citizens of their own accord.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: corporate ethics participation PCS Phosphate

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: PCS Phosphate: Air quality permit sees light of day, stinks
Next Post: Crude Rage – A Sea in Flames reviewed ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Building Policies for Stewardship
March 10, 2011
Conservation
PCS Phosphate: Air quality permit sees light of day, stinks
July 24, 2011
Uncategorized
Why Listen to the Local Guy?
May 3, 2011
Uncategorized
State of the Field: Policy is not just for policymakers anymore
February 1, 2011

3 thoughts on “PCS Phosphate: Participation is necessary, whether or not it’s required”

  1. Patricia Frank says:
    August 4, 2011 at 12:42 pm

    For some updates and a thorough look at why Carteret County businesses and residents are STILL sulfurious about this sulfur issue, read David DuBuisson’s opinion piece in the Raleigh News & Observer.

    Dave and his wife work in tourism-dependent hospitality in Beaufort NC. I’ve posted Dave’s piece, in its entirety, here on Vibrant Village: http://vibrantvillage.com/2011/08/04/why-were-still-sulfurious/

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    August 4, 2011 at 1:10 pm

    Thanks for the update and continuing coverage! The whole “it was public from the start” line reminds me of a Douglas Adams quote:

    “`…You hadn’t exactly gone out of your way to call attention to them had you? I mean like actually telling anyone or anything.’
    `But the plans were on display…’
    `On display? I eventually had to go down to the cellar to find them.’
    `That’s the display department.’
    `With a torch.’
    `Ah, well the lights had probably gone.’
    `So had the stairs.’
    `But look you found the notice didn’t you?’
    `Yes,’ said Arthur, `yes I did. It was on display in the bottom of a locked filing cabinet stuck in a disused lavatory with a sign on the door saying “Beware of The Leopard”.'”

  3. Patricia Frank says:
    August 11, 2011 at 12:35 pm

    Wonderful quote from Douglas Adams…and yes, so very applicable. Does anyone else holds out hope that we can contribute to a win-win situation for the Port and the community? After listening the Port folks express their view points the other night at the Morehead City Town Council meeting, I’m wondering what we can do to help them keep their jobs, attract new ones–and at the same time help the Port grow in a healthy, non-toxic, dangerous way.

    Maybe I’m a dreamer (John Lennon), but my thoughts are here: http://vibrantvillage.com/2011/08/10/supporting-the-port/

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.July 26, 2018Andrew Thaler
No, we didn't find the Loch Ness Monster with Apple MapsNo, we didn't find the Loch Ness Monster with Apple MapsApril 18, 2014Andrew Thaler
UN Ocean Conference Manu ChampionshipUN Ocean Conference Manu ChampionshipJune 5, 2025Angelo Villagomez
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown