Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Your help needed: Oppose a weakened shark finning ban in Maryland

Posted on January 26, 2014January 26, 2014 By David Shiffman 56 Comments on Your help needed: Oppose a weakened shark finning ban in Maryland
Science

The state of Maryland is proposing new regulations that would, among other things, weaken the state ban on shark finning by allowing fishermen to remove the fins of smoothhound sharks at sea,  as long as the ratio of the weight of the fins does not exceed 12% of the ratio of the carcasses. These “fin ratios” are already troubling and ineffective ways to enforce finning bans. Landing sharks with fins naturally attached is considered the best practice for shark fisheries management. A 12% ratio is exceptionally high (3.5-5% are common ratios worldwide) and risks enabling unscrupulous fishermen to remove the fins of not only smoothhound sharks, but other species whose fins could be passed off as such. This makes it harder for managers to track how many sharks of which species are being killed.

In New York, smoothhounds are landed with fins naturally attached. They should be in Maryland, too! Photo credit: Sonja Fordham.
Some fishermen claim that smoothhound sharks can’t be landed with fins naturally attached, but this photo from New York challenges that notion.  Photo provided anonymously for this post.

Maryland’s Department of Natural Resources is taking public comments on this policy, which means that you can help!

Please send an e-mail to fisheriespubliccomment@dnr.state.md.us by the end of the day on Monday, January 27th containing the following information:

Critical information (must be included)

  • Subject line: Public comment about  Regulations .02, .03, and .04 under COMAR 08.02.22
  • I oppose the proposal to allow a fin-to-carcass ratio of 12% for smoothhound sharks

Optional arguments:

  • Fin-to-carcass ratios are a problematic method for enforcing a finning ban that creates the opportunity for illegal finning to be undetected, and make it harder for managers to collect species-specific landing data.
  • The higher the fin to carcass ratio, the greater the chances for undetected finning; a 12% ratio would be the highest in the world.
  • The proposed policy risks finning of not only smoothhound sharks, but also many other shark species (some of which are prohibited) with similar looking fins.
  • A complete ban on removal of shark fins at sea (a requirement that all sharks be landed with fins naturally attached)  is considered the best practice by most U.S. scientists and fisheries managers.
  • Please cancel the proposed exception for smoothhound sharks, and apply a fins naturally attached policy in Maryland while promoting the same within the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
  • Smoothhound sharks currently have no other protections in MD or Federal waters.  It is imperative that the ban on finning them is properly and rigorously enforced.

Please send a public comment, please share this with interested colleagues, and please post a comment on the blog post to let me know that you’ve submitted a public comment!

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: maryland department of natural resources shark fin to carcass ratio shark finning shark finning ban shark fisheries management sustainable shark fisheries

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Abnormal is the New Normal: Shifting Baselines, Polar Vortices, and Climate Change
Next Post: 7 ways to make beaches safer without killing sharks ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Book review: man and shark
March 28, 2012
Blogging
Does Shark Week portrayal of sharks matter?
June 29, 2015
Conservation
10 components of a sustainable shark fishery, and how you can help implement them
November 7, 2013
Conservation
Send testimony to help protect Guam’s sharks!
January 26, 2011

56 thoughts on “Your help needed: Oppose a weakened shark finning ban in Maryland”

  1. Houston Wong says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:11 pm

    Comment sent!

  2. Ashley says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:13 pm

    What does the US need to hunt and kill sharks for their fins. The act alone is absolutely wrong and immoral. But who in the US eats shark fin soup! We as a nation need to set an example and stop killing these creatures and any other marine animals just for the shear sake . Our oceans are suffering! And it won’t be long before we can do nothing about the extinction and destruction of the oceans. I oppose shark finning and we greatly need stronger policies against it.

  3. Ben Goldfarb says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:28 pm

    Comment sent. Thanks for doing this.

  4. Heather Williams says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:41 pm

    Sent and shared!

  5. Devon Benton says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:41 pm

    Sending now!

  6. Thomas Ponce says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:43 pm

    Email has been sent!

  7. Devon Benton says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:46 pm

    Sent 🙂

  8. John Sexton says:
    January 26, 2014 at 5:52 pm

    Just sent my email to them.

  9. Zoe says:
    January 26, 2014 at 6:02 pm

    ugh – comment sent. thanks.

  10. Priscilla van Rooyen says:
    January 26, 2014 at 6:24 pm

    Comment sent.

  11. Wendy Scott says:
    January 26, 2014 at 6:42 pm

    Sent comment.

  12. Melissa Michaelson says:
    January 26, 2014 at 7:35 pm

    Done! Is there an actual link to the comment period?

  13. Jess B. says:
    January 26, 2014 at 7:47 pm

    Sent!

  14. Eugene Fisher-Haydis says:
    January 26, 2014 at 7:59 pm

    Comment sent.

  15. macca1mcmanus says:
    January 26, 2014 at 8:55 pm

    done – thanks David!

  16. Amanda Mcneese says:
    January 26, 2014 at 9:06 pm

    comment sent

  17. jose luis poucell f says:
    January 26, 2014 at 11:11 pm

    Demostrado está que la explotación irracional de recursos naturales, lo cual incluye la fauna, trae graves consecuencias en todos los micro ecosistemas, daño que se extiende al macro ecosistema. Una de estas irracionales explotaciones es acerca de esta especie animal que tan difícilmente se reproduce aun en condiciones naturales. Exigimos a las autoridades vigilar estos recursos naturales difícilmente renovables, o no renovales si llegan a la extinción.

  18. Dr. Robert Madden says:
    January 26, 2014 at 11:39 pm

    I am here by writing to those concerned to express my personal, and strongest opposition to the proposal to allow a fin-to-carcass ratio of 12% for smoothhound sharks.

    I am expressing my opposition and abhorrent rejection of this proposal on the basis of the following points:

    • Fin-to-carcass ratios are a problematic method for enforcing a finning ban that creates the opportunity for illegal finning to be undetected, and make it harder for managers to collect species-specific landing data.
    • The higher the fin to carcass ratio, the greater the chances for undetected finning; a 12% ratio would be the highest in the world.
    • The proposed policy risks finning of not only smoothhound sharks, but also many other shark species (some of which are prohibited) with similar looking fins.
    • A complete ban on removal of shark fins at sea (a requirement that all sharks be landed with fins naturally attached) is considered the best practice by most U.S. scientists and fisheries managers.
    • Please cancel the proposed exception for smoothhound sharks, and apply a fins naturally attached policy in Maryland while promoting the same within the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission
    • Smoothhound sharks currently have no other protections in MD or Federal waters. It is imperative that the ban on finning them is properly and rigorously enforced.

    Whilst I appreciate that I am not a US citizen nor do I reside in the US, the protection of all species from unnecessary and barbaric practices is a global issue. I cannot sit-back and remain silent whilst the destruction of top-predators, which has a proven knock on effect further down the ecological ladder, or for that matter any species, is brutally butchered.

    I hope that my rejection of this proposal does not fall upon deaf ears, everyone has a duty to protect and preserve this planet for future generations, not our own selfish monetary gains.

    Yours in fervent opposition

    Dr. Robert H.C. Madden
    MSci (Hons)(Dunelm) Ph.D. (Curtin) FGS

  19. Ayisha Hassanali says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:16 am

    Sent and shared.

  20. Carol Rush Smouse says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:44 am

    Comment sent

  21. Carol Housman says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:48 am

    Comment sent

  22. Brooke says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:13 am

    Comment sent

  23. Laurent Roger says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:51 am

    Comment sent

  24. Rich Minshaw (@rinsure) says:
    January 27, 2014 at 4:09 am

    Comment sent.

  25. Lisa says:
    January 27, 2014 at 5:52 am

    Emailing now!

  26. Viv Jamieson says:
    January 27, 2014 at 6:33 am

    comment sent

  27. lisa says:
    January 27, 2014 at 7:44 am

    hello. I sent the comment off as requested!

  28. Claire says:
    January 27, 2014 at 7:56 am

    Done

  29. Sarah Mucha says:
    January 27, 2014 at 8:36 am

    Sent!!

  30. Aysia Miguens says:
    January 27, 2014 at 9:25 am

    Done, thank you!

  31. Makomike says:
    January 27, 2014 at 9:30 am

    What would you consider to be a valid ratio of fin weight to carcass weight?

  32. Saraswati says:
    January 27, 2014 at 9:42 am

    I have tried my best to send an email to the public comment, I hope they would really consider our thought. Very best of luck to us and the sharks.

  33. David Shiffman says:
    January 27, 2014 at 10:05 am

    I consider fin to carcass ratios to be a not very good means of enforcing finning bans, but the international average is about 3.5%. 12% would be among the highest in the world, and it isn’t based on any actual data.

  34. Collin VanBuren says:
    January 27, 2014 at 10:16 am

    Sent!!

  35. Hector the Blue Shark says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:18 am

    Comment submitted! Thanks for bringing this into the public eye, David!

  36. Elaine Brewer says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:23 am

    Comment(s) sent!

  37. Jake Jerome says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:24 am

    Comment Sent!

  38. Tara says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:27 am

    Comment emailed…

  39. Karima Cherif says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:30 am

    Comment sent, but you would get a better response if you made it less steps from most people.

  40. David Steen, Ph.D. (@AlongsideWild) says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:35 am

    Comment sent.

  41. David Shiffman says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:39 am

    I’m sorry, are you joking? How could the process possible be easier than e-mailing a provided e-mail address with a provided subject and provided content? I don’t see how this could possibly take more than a minute.

  42. Jennifer Pitzer says:
    January 27, 2014 at 11:50 am

    Comment Sent. Very easy, thank you!

  43. Makomike says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:12 pm

    Averages mean nothing, the average will vary from species to species. Why wouldn’t you conduct a study and figure out what a “reasonable” ratio would be? Forcing dogfish to be landed with fins attached is NOT a reasonable alternative, unless you are simply trying to shut down the fishery. I’m willing to take your word for the fact that 12% is not a reasonable number, but what is?

  44. Zoe says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:30 pm

    Can someone please explain to me why some humans feel they have a right to torture wildlife with actions like this? It is really like chopping off someone’s arms and legs and tossing them aside to slowly bleed to death. This behavior shows up with so many species in various ways. I am serious – please explain!

  45. Andy Lyon says:
    January 27, 2014 at 12:50 pm

    Comment sent , lets hope we can make a difference. I feel ashamed of the a portion of the human race and their intolerance to such a magnificent animal.

  46. Makomike says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:04 pm

    The issue isn’t torture. The issue us whether fishermen can use their down time (the ride back to the dock) to start processing the fish for consumption or whether all the processing activity has to take place on land.

  47. Zoe says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:14 pm

    It is fine to be concerned with the efficient use of time, but consideration and respect has to be given to the creature who is providing a paycheck, don’t you think? It is definitely torture for the finned shark. There is more than one issue here. However, that really does not answer my question.

  48. Brian K Linville says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:25 pm

    I sent my comment.

  49. tracy says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:48 pm

    done

  50. Makomike says:
    January 27, 2014 at 1:50 pm

    They are also eviscerated at the same time. Not much different than how almost all animals, and all fish are processed for food.

  51. Olivia says:
    January 27, 2014 at 2:07 pm

    Thanks for bringing this to the public eye, so disgusting. This is an area that desperately needs strong legislation!

  52. Veerle (Vee) Roelandt says:
    January 27, 2014 at 2:12 pm

    Comment sent off !

  53. Tina says:
    January 27, 2014 at 4:18 pm

    comment sent!

  54. sarah says:
    January 27, 2014 at 4:22 pm

    public comment submitted!

  55. Danielle Keller says:
    January 27, 2014 at 5:31 pm

    Sent and thank you for publicly sharing this!

  56. simone says:
    January 28, 2014 at 8:38 am

    Public comment submitted hope its not too late!

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Considering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceConsidering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceJuly 7, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?May 29, 2024David Shiffman
AuthorsOctober 27, 2013Administrator
Please don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new  guide to responsible shark divingPlease don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new guide to responsible shark divingMarch 12, 2017David Shiffman
The Urgency is Artificial. My comment on the proposed permitting of deep-sea mining leases off American SamoaThe Urgency is Artificial. My comment on the proposed permitting of deep-sea mining leases off American SamoaJuly 1, 2025Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown