Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

More large sharks were killed by recreational anglers than commercial fishermen in the U.S. last year

Posted on October 29, 2014October 29, 2014 By David Shiffman 2 Comments on More large sharks were killed by recreational anglers than commercial fishermen in the U.S. last year
Conservation, Science

aThe United States National Marine Fisheries Service just released the 2013 “fisheries of the United States” report. The extremely detailed report contains lots of important information on both recreational and commercial fisheries in U.S. waters, and I recommend giving it a thorough read. I noticed an interesting detail about the U.S. shark fishery, though. In 2013, more large (non-dogfish) sharks were landed by U.S. recreational shark anglers (~4.5 million pounds) than by U.S. commercial shark fishermen (~3 million pounds). This was not the case in 2012.

In total, U.S. commercial fishermen landed about 21.5 million pounds of sharks in 2013, including 18.5 million pounds of dogfish. The dogfish fishery is by far the largest U.S. shark fishery by weight of landings, by number of individual sharks killed, and by value and there are some important management concerns about this fishery (smoothhound sharks are dogfish). And while dogfish are sharks, too, this means that approximately 3 million pounds of larger non-dogfish sharks were landed by U.S. commercial fishermen in 2013.

1

 

It’s also worth noting that U.S. commercial skate fisheries result in much higher landings (and much higher value) than the entire U.S. commercial shark fishery (including dogfish):

2

Recreational shark anglers, in contrast, landed approximately 4.5 million pounds of non-dogfish sharks  in 2013, almost 150% of what was landed by U.S. commercial shark fishermen.   Interestingly, this is also almost three times what was landed  by recreational shark anglers in 2012, and the third highest reported landings in the last decade.

3

This difference in landings can partially be explained by differences in scale between the fisheries. In 2011, there were 217 “directed shark” commercial fishing permits issued as part of the U.S. Highly Migratory Species management plan for sharks, and this new report notes that 11 million recreational anglers took 71 million fishing trips last year (not just for sharks, overall).

An additional table (page 45) notes that approximately 377,000 individual “cartilaginous fish” (including sharks, skates and rays) were landed in 2013, and about 11.5 million cartilaginous fish were released without being landed. Undoubtedly many (though a number impossible to quantify from this report) of these released animals did not survive and suffered post-release mortality. It’s also important to note that the ** next to “other sharks” in this table notes that the species included in “other sharks” for recreational fisheries are different than those included in “other sharks” for commercial fisheries, though that doesn’t really matter for the purpose of my simple analysis here.

In terms of overall U.S. ocean conservation policy, this doesn’t mean much. With some important exceptions, the U.S. commercial shark fishery is considered to be relatively well-managed, part of an overall U.S. commercial fishery that has rebuilt 34 previously overfished stocks of fish since the year 2000 with the help of strong science-based fisheries management. This data certainly suggests that dogfish and skates should get more attention from elements of the U.S. conservation community interested in the impacts of U.S. commercial fisheries on marine life, though. It also suggests that recreational angling for sharks, long thought of as minor and insignificant next to commercial fisheries, should be considered more seriously (in U.S. waters, at least).

UPDATE: Commercial statistics include landings only, and therefore do not include sharks that were caught as unintentional bycatch and dumped at sea. Many sharks caught as bycatch are landed, though.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: recreational shark fishing

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: The greater good: animal welfare vs. conservation
Next Post: Progress: It’s now only legal to remove fins at sea for one shark species in the United States ❯

You may also like

Science
17 amazing and important things about sharks and rays that scientists discovered in 2017
December 22, 2017
Conservation
37 things I learned about shark ecology and conservation for my dissertation
December 12, 2016
Science
Background information on our land-based shark fishing paper
August 15, 2017
Conservation
An open letter to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission on revising land-based recreational shark fishing regulations
April 17, 2018

2 thoughts on “More large sharks were killed by recreational anglers than commercial fishermen in the U.S. last year”

  1. Alex Curtis says:
    November 3, 2014 at 2:49 am

    Interesting observation, David, and a strong argument for accounting for recreational fisheries in the overall picture, The headline is pretty misleading though, given the level of discards and likely discard mortality in commercial vs recreational fisheries impacting sharks. Better accounting for commercial discards of elasmos is also badly needed.

  2. David Shiffman says:
    November 3, 2014 at 7:14 am

    There’s plenty of discard mortality in recreational fisheries, too. This data suggests that about 35-30 times as many non-dogfish sharks are released as landed, and many of those likely die.

    But we can only compare the data we have.

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!June 16, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.July 26, 2018Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown