Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

What’s Killing California’s Sea Otters?

Posted on September 17, 2010September 20, 2010 By Andrew Thaler 8 Comments on What’s Killing California’s Sea Otters?
Conservation, Science

ResearchBlogging.org

Sea Otters are turning up dead in central California. In 2007, 11 sea otters were recovered from Monterrey Bay. Over the last three years, dead otters washing up on beaches has reached a record high?

What could be causing all these otter deaths? Are there new predators in the area? Is there some kind of disease? Could increased otter deaths reflect an increase in otter populations, indicating not otter population decline, but otter population growth? The answer turns out to be even more surprising – freshwater algae.

Here no Otter, Sea no Otter, Speak no Otter

Blue-green algae (technically a cyanobacteria) is found throughout the world in freshwater and estuary ecosystems. Although generally harmless, several strains have been identified that produce the toxin microcystin. Microcystin causes liver damage and may induce tumor development. Like mercury and other environmental toxins, microcystin undergoes trophic amplification – the higher up in the food chain you are, the bigger the dose you have. Until now, microcystin was considered a freshwater, not marine, problem.

A.) Gross appearance of normal sea otter liver. B.) Swollen, hemorrhagic liver from a sea otter that died due to microcystin intoxication. C.) Microscopic view of normal sea otter liver, D.) Microscopic appearance of liver from an otter that died due to microcystin intoxication, demonstrating hepatocyte swelling, cytoplasmic vacuolation, necrosis or apoptosis and parenchymal hemorrhage. Small greenish-gold accumulations of bile are apparent at the upper left and center-right portions of the photomicrograph. (Miller et al. 2010)

In a recent paper from PLoS ONE, Miller et at. detected high concentrations of microcystin in dead sea otters, as well as liver damage from the contamination. They approach this study in a three-pronged attack.

1. Microcystin-producing harmful-algal blooms were confirmed in freshwater bodies in the same region as the dead otters, and microcystin was detecting in nearby estuary and marine systems.

2. Physical and chemical analysis of dead otter tissue confirmed damage caused by microcystin ingestion.

3. The mechanism for microcystin uptake through invertebrate food sources was established in laboratory experiments.

The third point forms the keystone of this study. Not only did they confirm that microcystin was present in the environment and present in the otters, but they provide a mechanism for the toxin to reach the sea otters through their food source. Otters with a major marine bivalve component in their diets that fed in areas near microcystin-producing algal blooms, are more susceptible to microcystin poisoning.

Several factors are in play here. The first and most obvious is that biological systems are connected. Problems with freshwater systems don’t just affect freshwater systems, marine ecosystems are not separate from freshwater ecosystems. Second, the cause of disease isn’t always obvious – before 1946 no one even knew that blue-green algae blooms were toxic, and even then no one though they were affecting marine ecosystems. This is, in fact, the first case of microcystin infecting a marine mammal. Finally, establishing a mechanism for uptake is essential for determining the underlying cause and designing a mitigation scheme. It’s not enough to know that microcystin exists and that sea otters have been contaminated with it, we also need to know how that contamination occurs, otherwise there’s no way to manage it.

~Southern Fried Scientist


Miller, M., Kudela, R., Mekebri, A., Crane, D., Oates, S., Tinker, M., Staedler, M., Miller, W., Toy-Choutka, S., Dominik, C., Hardin, D., Langlois, G., Murray, M., Ward, K., & Jessup, D. (2010). Evidence for a Novel Marine Harmful Algal Bloom: Cyanotoxin (Microcystin) Transfer from Land to Sea Otters PLoS ONE, 5 (9) DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012576

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: liver microcystin sea otters

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Weekly dose of TED – Freeman Dyson says: let’s look for life in the outer solar system
Next Post: Sharks are not to blame for increases in California Sea Otter deaths ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Frisky Anglerfish, Persistent Aquatic Living Sensors, Make for the Planet Borneo, Sea Cucumber Mafia, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: March 26, 2018
March 26, 2018
Weekly Salvage
Voyaging canoes, failed sea-steading sea states, breaching ocean plastic, deep-sea mining, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: July 2, 2018
July 2, 2018

8 thoughts on “What’s Killing California’s Sea Otters?”

  1. Chuck says:
    September 17, 2010 at 12:54 pm

    This is really interesting. The biggest theory I’ve heard about this is that killer whales in the area are increasingly turning to sea otters as a source of food (and it takes a lot of sea otters to run a killer whale). It sucks for the otters that the seem to be getting hit from both the top-down and bottom-up.

  2. Mike Olson says:
    September 17, 2010 at 1:10 pm

    I enjoyed this article too. I didn’t know the otters were having difficulties at all. As to the first comment: Is this true? Are otters also dealing with greater predation by killer whales?

  3. Rosalind says:
    September 17, 2010 at 8:30 pm

    Interesting.

    I’m going to take a short moment to be a microbiologist: they aren’t algae, they are cyanobacteria. HUGE physiological difference. It’s mostly PLoSone’s fault for allowing that article title. Where’d the peer review go? My last paper changed it’s title three times! Anyway, the harmful creatures are cyanobacteria.

    Okay, back down from soapbox. Typically, cyanobacteria bloom in places with lots of phosphorus contamination because they are nitrogen fixers. If we can convince people that dishwasher detergent kills Sea Otters maybe that’s a good environmental campaign! Cute creatures tend to help the cause.

    Rosalind
    Girls Are Geeks

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 17, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    You’re technically correct, but since cyanobacteria are colloquially referred to as “blue-green algae”, and Harmful Algal Bloom is an overarching description of the phenomenon, I see this as more along the lines of casually calling critters jellyfish or starfish than actually being a typo. This paper is clearly geared towards catching policymakers eyes.

    But yeah, otters are way cuter than menhaden.

  5. Chuck says:
    September 18, 2010 at 1:52 am

    Menhaden are way tastier though.

  6. Chuck says:
    September 18, 2010 at 1:58 am

    The main citation for it is Estes et al. (1998) from Science. It was pretty controversial when it first came out. William Stolzenburg covers it really well in his book Where the Wild Things Were.

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Donald Trump and Sharks: An Annotated TimelineDonald Trump and Sharks: An Annotated TimelineJune 27, 2024David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Considering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceConsidering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceJuly 7, 2025David Shiffman
AuthorsOctober 27, 2013Administrator
Please don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new  guide to responsible shark divingPlease don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new guide to responsible shark divingMarch 12, 2017David Shiffman
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
About Southern Fried ScienceOctober 27, 2013Administrator
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown