Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

An update on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR

Posted on March 31, 2010April 4, 2010 By David Shiffman 1 Comment on An update on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR
Science

I know that many of you have been losing sleep over the questionable quality of my first PCR and gel. Well, the mystery has been solved! My lab partner made the gel with DI water instead of with TAE/agarose solution. Not only is that an easily fixable problem for the future… it’s something that, for once, is completely not my fault! Woo hoo! I have another PCR running right now, I’ll run the gel in the morning, and I’ll post the results ASAP.

~WhySharksMatter

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: PCR

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 31st, 2010
Next Post: Has President Obama broken a promise on offshore drilling? ❯

You may also like

Science
WhySharksMatter’s 2nd PCR
April 5, 2010
Science
Kary Mullis’ Eureka Moment
March 26, 2010
Conservation
Establishing Best Practices to Minimize Waste in a Conservation Genetics Lab
November 14, 2012
Weekly Salvage
Eat hagfish, work at LUMCON, clone Vaquita, question floating trash collectors, and more! Monday Morning Mega-Salvage: August 13, 2018
August 13, 2018

One thought on “An update on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR”

  1. Bob O'H says:
    March 31, 2010 at 3:30 pm

    Discovery Institute water? No wonder it was useless.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

How many of these shark Jeopardy clues can you get correct?How many of these shark Jeopardy clues can you get correct?November 5, 2026David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
We Asked IMCC7 Attendees What Ocean Conservation Needs. Here's What They Said.We Asked IMCC7 Attendees What Ocean Conservation Needs. Here's What They Said.November 5, 2026Angelo Villagomez
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
For when the madness ends: a 5-point plan for getting conservation back on track in the USFor when the madness ends: a 5-point plan for getting conservation back on track in the USJuly 9, 2026Ali Gaster
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
What sharks would Odysseus have encountered during his journey?What sharks would Odysseus have encountered during his journey?October 9, 2026David Shiffman
Phantom science - how "AI slop" is making environmental policyPhantom science - how "AI slop" is making environmental policyMarch 30, 2026Chris Parsons
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown