Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Pseudoscience Redux: Greenwashing – Is there really a sustainable Orange Roughy fishery?

Posted on October 6, 2011October 4, 2011 By Andrew Thaler 6 Comments on Pseudoscience Redux: Greenwashing – Is there really a sustainable Orange Roughy fishery?
Uncategorized

This post was originally published on September 6, 2010 as a part of our first Week of Ocean Pseudoscience. Enjoy!


Wandering through the grocery store the other day, I noticed something strange in the fish bin. Now, in general I’m pretty conscious of where my fish comes from, how it was caught, whether the fishery as a whole or the specific population is sustainable. I pay attention to those details and I can usually tell when a company’s branding is legitimate and when it’s just greenwashing.

Imagine my shock when I found a packet of Orange Roughy, sold by the Full Circle brand, and marketed as sustainable.

Orange Roughy, Hoplostethus atlanticus, is a large deep-sea fish found in both the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans. Like many deep-sea vertebrates, it has a very long life history, taking several decades to reach maturity and living for 100 years or more. Orange roughy occur at abundant on seamounts, making them prime target for deep-sea trawlers.

About 25 years ago, Orange Roughy were discovered as an easily exploitable deep-sea fishery. Roughy were caught in huge numbers to be turned into white fish fillets and served as luxury meals.  They quickly became a very valuable fish, but were caught in such great numbers that many catches had to be thrown out to prevent market saturation.

It should be no surprise that roughy populations were quickly fished to near extinction. In a 2001 paper, orange roughy populations off the coast of New Zealand were assessed to determine if responsible management could allow the roughy to recover while still supporting a fishery. The results were promising but inconclusive. Some populations showed signs of recovery, but others were still declining.

The orange roughy life-cycle makes it incredibly vulnerable to exploitation, so why is this fillet wrapped in the trappings of sustainable fisheries?

'Wild caught, Pure, All Natural"

Full Circle is Lowes Food’s eco-brand. They sell everything from diapers to seafood, all in packaging that screams all-natural and environmentally friendly. Some of their seafood bears the stamp of the Marine Stewardship Council.

On their website, part of their mission statement is:

Sustainability Comes Full Circle

“At Full Circle™ we are dedicated to helping you “Return to a natural way of living.”™  In turn, we believe our own actions must always embody the principle of sustainability.  We’re committed to improving the quality of life for each of our customers, lessening the impact of our products on the environment, and promoting a return to a more natural, sustainable lifestyle.”

…

“Sustainability—for the individual and for the Earth—is the mission of the Full Circle™ line of quality products.  We offer better, more affordable alternatives to allow you to “Return to a natural way of living.”™ … to improve the quality of life for our families, our friends, and the planet.  That’s the Full Circle™ promise!”

Source

bullshit
Orange Roughy label

Even the Orange Roughy label itself reads as though this fish is a good choice for the environment. If you can’t read the label, it says:

Full Circle All Natural Wild Orange Roughy Fillets are always wild caught and harvested from healthy runs. We work closely with a select group of quality-conscious fishermen to ensure that our products are the finest quality. [the rest is a discussion of health benefits]

What immediately caught my eye was the statement that their roughy were harvested from healthy runs. What exactly is a run of deep-sea fish? This deceptive labeling reads as though someone took the copy from their Salmon packaging and replaced “Salmon” with “Orange Roughy”. Regardless, the label is false advertising because there is no such thing as a roughy ‘run’.

The packaging point consumers to their website for more information. If there is any actual information about the sustainability of their individual seafood products, 3 veteran bloggers could not find it.

More importantly though, is the claim that the roughy is fished from a healthy source and that this product somehow exists under their umbrella of sustainability.

Can there really be such a thing as sustainable orange roughy?

Despite attempts to fish at maximum sustainable yield (don’t worry, we’ll be addressing MSY later this week), the New Zealand fishery has continuously overestimated and revised it’s catch quotas. Orange roughy is listed as conservation dependent by the IUCN. Many retailers refuse to stock the fish. The world’s largest container shipping company has declared that it will not transport orange roughy (along with several other over-fished species). Even Red Lobster has a franchise-wide ban on serving Orange Roughy. As it stands now, orange roughy is not a sustainable fishery.

There may, with wise, informed management, be a future for orange roughy on the dinner table, but that future is not here yet. For a company to market orange roughy as a healthy, sustainable fishery is simply greenwashing.

~Southern Fried Scientist

UPDATE: Twitter user @highlyanne has sent in a picture of the text from the back of a Full Circle Wild Alaskan Salmon packet. As suspected, the text is identical, with the exception of changing Salmon to Roughy and updating the location. Guess we know where the “run” came from. See for yourself!

If you can’t read it, it says:

Full Circle All Natural Alaskan Sockeye Salmon Fillets are always wild caught and harvested from healthy runs. We work closely with a select group of quality-conscious fishermen to ensure that our products are the finest quality. [the rest is a discussion of health benefits, identical to the text for orange roughy]

UPDATE 2: After checking my local Lowes Foods, it appears that the packaging for Orange Roughy, Salmon, Cod, Halibut, and Swordfish all have the exact same wording, with changes only to the names of the fish and the location.


ResearchBlogging.org
Clark, M. (2001). Are deepwater fisheries sustainable? — the example of orange roughy (Hoplostethus atlanticus) in New Zealand Fisheries Research, 51 (2-3), 123-135 DOI: 10.1016/S0165-7836(01)00240-5

orange roughy

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: Orange Roughy

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Misunderstood Marine Life # 3 – Cryptics and Cryptids
Next Post: Deep Fried Sea: Here be dragons ❯

You may also like

Science
A slimehead by any other name should never be on your plate
October 26, 2011
Conservation
Greenwashing – Is there really a sustainable Orange Roughy fishery?
September 6, 2010

6 thoughts on “Pseudoscience Redux: Greenwashing – Is there really a sustainable Orange Roughy fishery?”

  1. Sharon says:
    October 6, 2011 at 8:34 pm

    Don’t know about the sourcing, but the plastic package itself certainly doesn’t look ‘green.’

  2. Eleanor says:
    October 7, 2011 at 9:01 am

    And you could ask the same question about MSC certified fisheries for Patagonian toothfish…a deep sea species that plays a really crucial role in a vulnerable ecosystem (one of the few that we haven’t completely trashed yet).

  3. Ted says:
    October 7, 2011 at 12:46 pm

    After reading this, I went looking for a guide to help when I’m in a restaurant or supermarket. Any favorites? I found Seafoodwatch from Monterrey Bay Aquarium.

    http://www.montereybayaquarium.org/cr/seafoodwatch.aspx

    Can anyone endorse this site or any other? I love seafood, but I love the oceans more.

  4. Mike says:
    October 7, 2011 at 4:49 pm

    Interesting piece Dave. Pretty shocking that the packaging is the same. Two things I was thinking though:

    1) Even though it says it is orange roughy…could they just be stealing the name to sell some other less enticing white fish fillets?

    2) If people really are concerned with sustainable seafood…don’t buy it from the store. I refuse to buy seafood from stores. I catch all my seafood myself…if I didn’t catch it, I don’t have it. The few times I do buy seafood it’s usually directly from true seafood markets or from the dock.

  5. Eric says:
    October 7, 2011 at 7:15 pm

    Grrrr! Such blatant green washing.

    Can’t wait for your article on MSY!

    Ted – Monterey Bay’s card is good, though not without critics. I think it’s overall the best out there for combining good science, clarity etc.

  6. WhySharksMatter says:
    October 7, 2011 at 10:51 pm

    Seafood Watch is pretty solid.

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!David Attenborough's Ocean is on Hulu and Disney+. Let's watch together and discuss it!June 16, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.How many nuclear weapons are at the bottom of the sea. An (almost certainly incomplete) census of broken arrows over water.July 26, 2018Andrew Thaler
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
Megalodon: the New Evidence is a fake documentaryMegalodon: the New Evidence is a fake documentaryAugust 7, 2014David Shiffman
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown