Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Save the light bulb, not the planet: A sneak peak at how Republicans will run the House

Posted on September 22, 2010September 22, 2010 By David Shiffman 17 Comments on Save the light bulb, not the planet: A sneak peak at how Republicans will run the House
Conservation

Political junkies like myself know that Republicans are expected to regain the House of Representatives following elections this November. The Democrats’ odds of keeping the Senate improved with the primary victory of corrupt Christine O’Donnell last week, but there is still a chance that the Republicans will retake the Senate. This isn’t surprising- the opposition party often gains seats in a midterm election. How will this takeover effect environmental policy in this country? It’s impossible to say for sure, but Politico has some predictions.

I don’t much care for Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), but she has done an admirable job of making the Capitol a greener place. From the Politico article:

“House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s imprint is everywhere: energy-efficient light bulbs, healthful, organic foods in cafeterias, aggressive recycling and, of course, a complete ban on smoking”

If Republicans win control of the House by gaining at least 39 seats, John Boehner (R-OH) would be Speaker.  Boehner considers Pelosi’s reforms to be a waste of money, and he laughed when the House cafeteria starting carrying foods that he hadn’t heard of before. Charming.

We can also look to conservative opinion leaders to see how Republicans would govern. The influential blog “Red State” has started a campaign to “Save the Light Bulb“. For those of you who are confused, they are talking about saving the incandescent bulb from crazy environmentalists who are promoting more energy-efficient fluorescent bulbs. This movement is far from widespread (the Facebook fan page has 8 fans, despite a stated goal of one million), but it has resulted in some press coverage.

In the end, I’m not sure how much of a difference a Republican controlled house will make, since the Democrats couldn’t pass a meaningful climate change bill when they ran things. On the other hand… save the light bulb? Seriously? How are the Democrats losing to people who are against energy efficiency?

~WhySharksMatter

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: christine o'donnell john boehner nancy pelosi republican house save the lightbulb

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Biodiversity Wednesday – Dora the Sperm Whale Explorer’s Deep-Sea Adventure, part 2
Next Post: 365 days of Darwin: 23 September 2010 ❯

You may also like

Conservation
Compact Fluorescent Lights, Energy, and Mercury
September 25, 2010
Conservation
Republican House leaders abandon Pelosi’s “green the capitol” initiative
April 7, 2011
Uncategorized
The Tea Party’s disturbing views about science
October 14, 2010
Conservation
An open letter about climate change to soon-to-be Speaker John Boehner
November 10, 2010

17 thoughts on “Save the light bulb, not the planet: A sneak peak at how Republicans will run the House”

  1. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 22, 2010 at 12:34 pm

    Why should anyone give a flying fuck what religion she’s dabbled in?

  2. Alan Dove says:
    September 22, 2010 at 12:49 pm

    “How are the Democrats losing to people who are against energy efficiency?”

    The same way they lost Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat to a former underwear model. That’s our two-party system: batshit-insane Republicans versus abysmally stupid Democrats. Take your pick.

  3. Mike Lisieski says:
    September 22, 2010 at 12:53 pm

    And why do incandescent lightbulbs matter at all? I can understand the “save Christmas” sort of reactionary campaigns to progressivism, since Christmas has some symbolic value. What does an incandescent bulb symbolize? Willful and futile inefficiency?

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 22, 2010 at 12:58 pm

    Apparently they want to protect an “American Invention”. I guess they never learned that the flourescent bulb was also invented by an American – Peter Cooper Hewitt.

  5. WhySharksMatter says:
    September 22, 2010 at 1:53 pm

    I personally am more concerned by her blatant corruption, but “witch” ranks just above “atheist” to most social conservatives (i.e. her supporters).

  6. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 22, 2010 at 1:57 pm

    So what? You want to stoop to their level? Why not just say she’s a secret Muslim?

  7. WhySharksMatter says:
    September 22, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    I wasn’t stooping to anyone’s level, I was reminding people of who O’Donnell is via mentioning a recent controversy in the news.

  8. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 22, 2010 at 3:41 pm

    Bullshit, you thought “witch-craft dabbling” was funny and wanted to take a cheap shot.

    How is that any different than saying “murderous born-again Christian Jeffery Dahmer”?

    You want to raise the discourse of politics above “save our light bulbs” why don’t we start with not demonizing public figures with trivial crap that has no bearing on governance?

  9. WhySharksMatter says:
    September 22, 2010 at 5:45 pm

    The offending passage has been removed because it distracts from the larger point. Apologies to anyone who it bothered.

  10. Mike McCallister says:
    September 23, 2010 at 10:27 pm

    Personally, I don’t see the point in having ORGANIC cafetria food. First off, why do these elected officials need cafeteria food (and how many actually eat there)? They should (and probably do) bring lunches…the cafeteria is probably used by their staff.

    Just to push the envelope a little, the energey efficient flourescnet bulbs may be more energy savy, however, when these bulbs do end up dying, what happens to them? Chances are most people will trash them, sending them to landfills, where they will break and realese mercury into the ecosystem. Granted it’s a minimal amount of mercury in each bulb, but there are A LOT of bulbs out there…

  11. Mike Lisieski says:
    September 25, 2010 at 1:06 am

    LED’s will do the trick in just a few years, I’ll bet.

  12. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 25, 2010 at 7:53 pm

    See my response to the mercury question here. The 10 word summery: Incandescent bulbs still produce more mercury than compact fluorescent lights.

  13. Karen says:
    September 26, 2010 at 6:48 pm

    Geez, remind me never to get on SFriedScientist’s bad side. Eep.

  14. Mike McCallister says:
    September 26, 2010 at 8:12 pm

    I was by no mean saying not to use compact flourescents. Merely just bringing up another view point to look at, and see where it would take the thread. Apparently, it ended up creating a totally new thread.

  15. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 26, 2010 at 11:14 pm

    Whiskey is for fightin’ and bloggin’

    Damn, now that shanty is running through my head.

  16. Rick Pikul says:
    October 31, 2010 at 7:06 pm

    They also never learned that Edison didn’t invent the incandescent bulb: He bought the patent from Woodward and Evans, a pair of Canadians.

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Why would a serious scientist agree to participate in a nonsense Shark Week show?Why would a serious scientist agree to participate in a nonsense Shark Week show?July 15, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?May 29, 2024David Shiffman
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Considering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceConsidering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceJuly 7, 2025David Shiffman
A quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyA quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyFebruary 7, 2024Andrew Thaler
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown