Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Skeptical David is skeptical of new efforts to de-extinct the smalltooth sawfish

Posted on January 11, 2016January 11, 2016 By David Shiffman
Uncategorized

On January 1, 2016, the Southern Fried Science central server began uploading blog posts apparently circa 2041. Due to a related corruption of the contemporary database, we are, at this time, unable to remove these Field Notes from the Future or prevent the uploading of additional posts. Please enjoy this glimpse into the ocean future while we attempt to rectify the situation.


Over Christmas, I finally got to tour the Ram Myers Center for Ocean Biodiversity Restoration captive breeding facility. The millions of gallons of saltwater tanks and the state of the art husbandry and genetics labs look like something out of Jurassic Park. The building itself is almost as impressive as the list of heavy-hitters who work for or consult with the Center, and they’ve had undeniable success with temperature-resistant reef-building corals and pH resistant shellfish and phytoplankton that can survive in our increasingly warm and acidified seas.

I was there to investigate their recently-announced efforts to de-extinct smalltooth sawfish by releasing captive-bred animals into the Everglades and the Bahamas. Once found as north as New York and as west as Texas, habitat destruction and bycatch caused these amazing animals’ range to shrink to one small part of South Florida by the late 1990’s. In the early 2000’s they became the first elasmobranch to be listed on the U.S. Endangered Species Act, and in 2027, they were sadly declared extinct in the wild. In the interest of transparency, I should say that I started my tour skeptical of the Center’s plans to de-extinct smalltooth sawfish, and my opinion remains the same after further investigation.

The author, playing with sawfish, circa 2014ish
The author, playing with sawfish, circa 2013

There’s no doubt that the technology exists to create a relatively large population of smalltooth sawfish through captive breeding, certain numbers large enough to let the wild population re-establish itself. Though extinct in the wild, these animals do well in captivity and are found in aquariums all over the world, and they’ve been have been successfully bred in captivity since 2012  In fact, back in 2013 I got to see the first captive-bred smalltooth sawfish. Additionally, recent advances in cloning allow scientists and aquarists to further augment captive populations, made easier by the species’ inherent ability to reproduce through parthenogenesis . If the technology exists for certain other bloggers who shall remain nameless to clone animals that have been extinct for millions of years as a prank, then the technology certainly exists to augment captive populations of a species extinct in the wild but still found in aquariums and research facilities.

No, the problem isn’t the technology required to raise animals in captivity, the problem is what happens next. Recreating populations may be possible, but you can’t release animals into an environment that no longer supports their survival.  Smalltooth sawfish have very specific habitat requirements, and destruction of those habitats throughout their range directly lead to their extinction. Those problems haven’t been fixed since 2027; if anything, they’ve gotten worse. Sea level rise and warming seas have all but destroyed the few mangrove habitats left after a century of destructive coastal development. Simply put, we can breed and clone hundreds of smalltooth sawfish in captivity, but if we release them into their old habitat as it currently is, they’d go extinct all over again.

If we want to release sawfish (or any of the countless other animals that have been proposed for de-extinction) back into the wild, we first need to fix the conditions that led to their extinction. Restoring coastal habitats like mangroves won’t just make those areas more suitable for re-releasing sawfish. It will also result in restoring all the ecosystem services that mangroves used to provide, things like shoreline stabilization, filtration of runoff waters, and nursery habitat for countless species of fish and invertebrates. If we fix the conditions that caused sawfish to go extinct, maybe we can prevent a need for de-extinction technology for other species in the future.


On January 1, 2016, the Southern Fried Science central server began uploading blog posts apparently circa 2041. Due to a related corruption of the contemporary database, we are, at this time, unable to remove these Field Notes from the Future or prevent the uploading of additional posts. Please enjoy this glimpse into the ocean future while we attempt to rectify the situation.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: de-extinction sawfish

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: A Gathering of Gremlins: Updates from a cranky Southern Fried Server
Next Post: The last ABI3730xl goes offline ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Red tide, whale poop, and vanishing puffins: Thursday Afternoon Dredging, August 30th, 2018
August 30, 2018
Conservation
Tweets from the American Elasmobranch Society: Elasmobranch Conservation
August 19, 2012
Uncategorized
Thursday Afternoon Dredging: December 1, 2016
December 1, 2016
Uncategorized
Parasitic mussel babies and big whale brains: Thursday Afternoon Dredging, November 30th, 2017
November 30, 2017

Popular Posts

What you read on Southern Fried Science in JanuaryWhat you read on Southern Fried Science in JanuaryJanuary 31, 2024Andrew Thaler
You probably don't want to work for me: What you read on Southern Fried Science in AprilYou probably don't want to work for me: What you read on Southern Fried Science in AprilApril 30, 2024Andrew Thaler
Ethical Debate: Should we have freed Willy?Ethical Debate: Should we have freed Willy?April 29, 2010David Shiffman
Playing God - How the ESA "God Squad" just voted for the extinction of a uniquely American whalePlaying God - How the ESA "God Squad" just voted for the extinction of a uniquely American whaleApril 9, 2026Southern Fried Science
Welcome stumblers, reddit-ers, and neatorama readersMay 24, 2010Andrew Thaler
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Does Shark Week portrayal of sharks matter?June 29, 2015David Shiffman
Reflections on science and my role in it, ten years since my Ph.D. defenseReflections on science and my role in it, ten years since my Ph.D. defenseApril 1, 2026David Shiffman
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
How to tell if a "shark in flooded city streets after a storm" photo is a fake in 5 easy stepsHow to tell if a "shark in flooded city streets after a storm" photo is a fake in 5 easy stepsJanuary 23, 2013David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown