Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Scientia Pro Publica #30

Posted on May 17, 2010 By David Shiffman 5 Comments on Scientia Pro Publica #30
Science

I am proud to host the latest edition of Scientia Pro Publica, a blog carnival that celebrates that best science, medicine, and nature writing aimed at the general public.

Biology/Evolution/Conservation

Melissa from Out Walking the Dog invites you to celebrate Bird Neck Appreciation Day. Learn how and why bird necks are so flexible and diverse.

Wendy from Bio Loser explains how fish react to their own reflection.

Sarah from Surprising Science shows us how we can find live online video of bird nests. It’s almost as cute as Puppy Cam.

Jeremy from Agricultural Diversity Weblog talks about genetically modified crops and how many people misunderstand them.

Madhu from Reconciliation Ecology tells an amusing story about how birds can be elitist. Certain bird species prefer to spend their time in more affluent parts of cities.

Medicine

Dr. Shock summarizes everything you always wanted to know about body piercings and psychopathology. Find out if your kid’s new piercing is indicative of other high risk behaviors.

Christie helps us to understand the role of insulin at Nutrition Wonderland.

Akshat from Contemplation asks if fish oil supplements are any good for children.

Science and Society

Warren from Generally Thinking reminds us all to be skeptical of how science is reported by the news media. A careless fact-checker or a changed word can alter the entire meaning of a scientific study.

Mike from Theoretically Speaking believes that involving non-specialists will improve the peer review process. As more and more science becomes interdisciplinary, I hope his idea catches on.

That’s all for now.

The next edition will be hosted by Andrew at 360 Degree Skeptic. To submit a blog post, use this handy online form.

~WhySharksMatter

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: bird neck diversity bird nest video body piercing fish oil fish reflection genetically modified crops insulin peer review science reporting Scientia Pro Publica

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Monday Morning Blogaerobics – some advice for your first trip to sea
Next Post: 365 days of Darwin: May 17, 2010 ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Scientia Pro Publica
April 5, 2010
Academic life
How I prepare a peer review
February 11, 2016
Conservation
Shades of Gray: Gray literature, peer-review, and the struggle for data in fisheries management
November 15, 2010
Science
Is peer-review best left to academic journals?
July 21, 2015

5 thoughts on “Scientia Pro Publica #30”

  1. Jeremy says:
    May 17, 2010 at 3:29 pm

    Thanks for another good selection.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.October 16, 2025David Shiffman
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
"Twitter sucks now and all the cool kids are moving to Bluesky:" Our new survey shows that scientists no longer find Twitter professionally useful or pleasant"Twitter sucks now and all the cool kids are moving to Bluesky:" Our new survey shows that scientists no longer find Twitter professionally useful or pleasantAugust 19, 2025David Shiffman
The Trouble with Teacup PigsThe Trouble with Teacup PigsOctober 14, 2012Andrew Thaler
Blackfish: the Science Behind the MovieBlackfish: the Science Behind the MovieSeptember 18, 2013Chris Parsons
Nodules, Lost Mines, and Dark Oxygen: A new documentary on deep-sea mining asks important questions about the future of the industry.Nodules, Lost Mines, and Dark Oxygen: A new documentary on deep-sea mining asks important questions about the future of the industry.July 24, 2025Andrew Thaler
Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.December 1, 2025David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown