Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross

Posted on March 18, 2010 By Andrew Thaler 4 Comments on Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross
Science

If you’re still unconvinced by previous meditations into the sub-par-ody of sharks, consider this study, reported over at Laelaps:

The simplest explanation was that the shark (or sharks) which left the marks had been intentionally trying to eat the feces. “From the curvature of the toothmarks and their positions on the specimens,” Godfrey and Smith write, “we reason that the majority of the fecal masses were in the sharks’ mouths.”

via Laelaps

Yup, David’s legendary ancient sharks ate poo.

~Southern Fried Scientist

Godfrey, S., & Smith, J. (2010). Shark-bitten vertebrate coprolites from the Miocene of Maryland Naturwissenschaften DOI: 10.1007/s00114-010-0659-x

*The preceding post has absolutely nothing to do with shark conservation.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: Chordata Dermata Dentata Regatta poop

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Bluefin tuna fails to make UN’s list of protected fish
Next Post: CITES update: Bluefin and crocodiles and polar bears? Oh my! ❯

You may also like

Science
Sharks are sub-par, at best
March 12, 2010
Weekly Salvage
Open Science in Africa, defend the ADA, the value of the outdoors, Minke whale rides, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: February 19, 2018.
February 19, 2018
Weekly Salvage
Unprecedented destruction in the deep Gulf of Mexico, The Ocean Cleanup’s River Pivot, and More! Weekly Salvage: October 28, 2019.
October 28, 2019
Science
Why sharks matter: a reply to “sharks are sub-par at best”
March 13, 2010

4 thoughts on “Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross”

  1. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 18, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    I might suggest reading the Laelaps article further. The very next sentences after the one you posted:

    “Yet, strangely, the coprolites were not ingested. Even though tiger sharks have often been cast as indiscriminate when it comes to food there has been no indication that they have ever deliberately eaten feces, and so the authors looked for a different explanation…The shark could have left impressions of the feces inside the crocodile during this stage of the attack or after the viscera of the crocodile had become exposed…The pattern of the bite marks and the fact that the feces were not ingested is consistent with a reconstruction in which, during an attack on another animal, the shark either bit through the body wall and guts to leave the tooth impressions or bit the intestines after disemboweling its prey. Such an attack would have left tooth marks on the feces, which probably fell out of the intestine shortly afterward, hence “In this scenario, the shark chose not to eat the feces, which drifted away, settled out of sight, or otherwise avoided attention.”

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 19, 2010 at 7:23 am

    While your facts are all completely correct, I totally disagree with your conclusions. Anthropogenic Global Warming is real and there is no serious debate among climate scientists.

  3. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 19, 2010 at 9:14 am

    Also, though sharks aren’t doing it, eating poop is ecologically important. There have been animals around for a few hundred million years at this point, and I for one don’t want to live in a world that’s covered in poop.

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 19, 2010 at 9:21 am

    Anthropogenic Global Warming is real, Dave.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.October 16, 2025David Shiffman
5 things you need to know about the proposed European Union shark finning ban, including how you can helpSeptember 17, 2012David Shiffman
Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?March 29, 2011David Shiffman
Why the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesWhy the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesSeptember 5, 2026Ali Gaster
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
13 wrong things about sharks that conservation advocates should stop saying in 2013 (and what they should say instead)December 27, 2012David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Getting a sense of porpoiseJanuary 20, 2009Andrew Thaler
U.S. government: shark fin bans "significantly undermine conservation and management of Federal shark fisheries"May 2, 2013David Shiffman
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown