Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Is peer-review best left to academic journals?

Posted on July 21, 2015 By Bluegrass Blue Crab
Science

If you have ever dealt with scientific data, you’ve probably encountered one of the shadier sides of science: academic publishing. While they’ve stood, in some cases, for centuries, as the official record of scientific advancement safeguarded under the watchful eye of peers, modern journals live in a modern world. Millions of words have already been spilled on the subject, so that’s not what this article is about. Instead, I’m left asking whether academic publishing is the only means of getting the stamp of peer-review these days?

The reasons leading me to ask this question are many, but primarily through working in a management arena lately. One example, in particular, highlighted many of the disconnects between the need for verified scientific data and the incentives of journals. This moment was at a Chesapeake Bay Program Sustainable Fisheries Goal Implementation Team meeting (for those of you not in the Chesapeake region, that’s a consortium of regional fisheries managers), where a room full of decision-makers needed a verified stock assessment of blue crabs to move forward with their management planning. Peer-review is the time-tested, well-understood, and arguably easiest means of verifying data.

They needed that stock assessment yesterday, and the pace of academic publishing just doesn’t fit that timeframe. I feel for the editors that have to ask 10 different reviewers if they will read an article, and then pester two of them to turn in reviews while doing all the stuff they actually get paid to do, but each step in that process is at least a couple of weeks, so the year creeps on. While some journals are attempting to tighten their timelines, the culture of academic publishing is one of molasses, and culture is a very hard thing to change.

from GenomicEnterprise.com
cartoon on academic publishing, from GenomicEnterprise.com

Back to that stock assessment – for those of you not in the fisheries world, it’s basically a count of the number of blue crabs in the Bay, split up by age classes and sex. It allows us to feed a fisheries model and predict what next year’s possible catch might look like. It’s VERY important information, but basically the opposite of sexy science. It’s not even new – these assessments are done every year or so, depending on the reproductive cycle of the focus species. The methods have been the same for decades, and should remain so in order to enable comparisons between the past and now. But these traits are basically the opposite of what journals are looking for – revolutionary new science that pushes the field forward. In these cases, editors will toss a manuscript before sending it out for peer review because it “doesn’t fit the journal”. However, sometimes science is done not to push science forward but to better inform society. This is one of those times.

In this case, the fisheries world already has a few avenues to find peer review outside academic journals – namely, agency technical reports and technical advisory committee reviews. Both of these forms of peer review focus on the quantitative and statistical aspects of the stock assessment to make sure we have the best numbers possible to help inform fisheries models and decision-making arenas. Many times, these kind of reports have minimal storytelling and outside context included, unlike journal papers, because the data just needs verification before going to a dedicated use. Everyone knows the context already. This is a great solution, but people aren’t as familiar with the review process and therefore sometimes don’t trust it as much as a journal article.

In addition, outside the stock assessment world, these kinds of avenues are more rare. In addition, academic publishing may not be rewarded for some careers or scientist roles as it is in academia, but can be a considerable investment in time. Think of citizen science groups with a volunteer base of scientists who want to contribute data to help some scientific issue move forward but may not have the time, skills, or desire to spend time writing an academic manuscript. They often find a data portal with some kind of review process as their final product. Or think of other scientific issues in need of a rapid response, like the sighting of a new or spreading invasive species or spread of a disease. By the time a journal article about gypsy moth spread comes out, entire forestlands may have been eaten.

I’d encourage everyone, in their efforts to make science more inclusive, to remember the many reaching arms of science into wide-ranging aspects of society, and peer-review has an important role to play. It just needs to come in a different format to fit the situation.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: academic publishing peer review

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Build a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican case
Next Post: Geese, snakeheads, and the ones that got away: Southern Fried Science Book Club, week 5 ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Boaty McBoatface triumphs, Narluga ascends, Sharks decline, too many bro-authors, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: June 24, 2019
June 24, 2019
Uncategorized
So you’ve been asked to review a manuscript? – Tips for the novice reviewer
November 28, 2015
Weekly Salvage
LarvaBots, turning the tide on captive dolphins, horror fish from the deep sea, ARA San Juan found, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: November 19, 2018.
November 19, 2018
Conservation
Shades of Gray: Gray literature, peer-review, and the struggle for data in fisheries management
November 15, 2010

Recent Popular Posts

Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.May 14, 2025Andrew Thaler
My "Follow ocean science and conservation experts on Bluesky and Instagram" assignmentMy "Follow ocean science and conservation experts on Bluesky and Instagram" assignmentNovember 19, 2024David Shiffman
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
Alberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetAlberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetOctober 16, 2012Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
Megalodon: the New Evidence is a fake documentaryMegalodon: the New Evidence is a fake documentaryAugust 7, 2014David Shiffman
A quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyA quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyFebruary 7, 2024Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown