Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Open Thread – Ghostwriters, academic integrity, and the Shadow Scholar

Posted on November 17, 2010November 20, 2010 By Andrew Thaler 18 Comments on Open Thread – Ghostwriters, academic integrity, and the Shadow Scholar
Uncategorized

The academic blogosphere is bursting with discussion over this article in the Chronicle of Higher Education: The Shadow Scholar. A professional academic ghostwriter spills the beans on how his business works, who buys his services, and how the system enables it. Go ahead and give it a read, we’ll be right here.

So what do educators do in this situation? Is the author right that the problem lies in the structure of academia? How do you catch something like this? Even if you suspected this kind of cheating, how would you prove it?

Stan?

Damn them all, indeed.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: open thread shadow scholar stan rogers

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Submit to the Beneath the Waves Film Festival
Next Post: Grading President Obama on science and conservation ❯

You may also like

Popular Culture
Weekend Open Thread
November 5, 2010
Uncategorized
Wednesday Morning Open Thread – skeptical chicken
June 13, 2012
Uncategorized
Wednesday Morning Open Thread – we’re gonna need a bigger boat
June 20, 2012
Uncategorized
Wednesday Morning Open Thread – an experiment
June 6, 2012

18 thoughts on “Open Thread – Ghostwriters, academic integrity, and the Shadow Scholar”

  1. Christie says:
    November 17, 2010 at 3:34 pm

    Damn. I don’t really even know how to respond to this – it kinda makes me feel sick to my stomach to think about.

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 17, 2010 at 4:11 pm

    A further question – On whom does the burden of morality lie? The students? The institutions? The ghostwriters? Some combination of everyone?

  3. WhySharksMatter says:
    November 18, 2010 at 12:04 am

    Wow. Just…wow.

    This “hired gun”, whatever his ethical issues, is clearly a brilliant person and a great writer. I wish that there was a better way for our society to use his talents.

    As for blame, I think it goes to everyone.

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 18, 2010 at 7:33 am

    Did we read the same article? While there was a huge amount of insight into the seedy underbelly of academia, the writing was formulaic and repetitive, with a structure that meandered into self-absorbed anecdotes with ambiguous connections. In short, exactly what I would expect from someone who churns out term papers like a factory.

  5. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 18, 2010 at 7:56 am

    I left this comment at another site, but liked it so much I’m putting it here, too. Apologies:

    Anyone else find it really funny that he chose the Count of Monte Cristo for his handle? A man educated in all fields while counting his days in prison, only to emerge as a mysterious noblemen, controlling society? Makes you wonder what Ed Dantes future plans are(and says a lot about what he thinks of himself).

    Maybe he’s plotting his revenge against his old alma matter, probably SUNY Albany, since without a French department, they won’t pick up on the allusion – http://genomebiology.com/2010/11/10/138

  6. wombat says:
    November 18, 2010 at 9:49 am

    For me the most interesting part turned out to be how many of the comments accused the guy of being a hoaxer. As a writer, I see these ads hiring for these services all the time, so I was surprised anyone doubted him. But despite the commentors who said they’d done similar work and others actually supplying links, there were still skeptics.

    Also as far as the meandering and repetition – yeah, he sure has learned to pad stuff out, just like he said. Do they not have editors over there at the Chronicle?

  7. WhySharksMatter says:
    November 18, 2010 at 10:20 am

    I didn’t mean that the article itself was well written, I just think it’s impressive that he’s written decent stuff for so many different fields.

  8. WhySharksMatter says:
    November 18, 2010 at 10:32 am

    Oh, snap!

  9. Alan Dove says:
    November 18, 2010 at 10:37 am

    Sadly, his little niche is only one corner of this rabbit hole. Google “medical ghostwriting,” and you’ll start plumbing a deeper, more insidious, and much more lucrative version of this activity. Perhaps that will be his next career.

  10. Jonathan Badger says:
    November 18, 2010 at 5:06 pm

    Exactly. Medical ghostwriting is a far more serious problem than frat boys weaseling out of a term paper by paying for a paper on Emily Dickinson or something. Those frat boys are just hurting themselves. Medical ghostwriters may actually be killing people.

  11. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 18, 2010 at 5:10 pm

    The author claims to have written for med students, nurses, pharmacy students, and seminary students, among others (including educators). This is way bigger than a few frat boys buying essays.

  12. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 18, 2010 at 5:18 pm

    Of course, medical ghostwriting is a way bigger deal. Wasn’t it last year that Merck was exposed for not only having pro-Merck pharmaceutical reports ghostwritten, but also having their own journal to publish in.

    As I understand it, there are also “reverse” ghostwriters in medicine – Doctors who will accept a fee to put their name on internally produced company studies.

  13. Mike Lisieski says:
    November 19, 2010 at 12:00 am

    School should be harder. If somebody with no specialized training in a topic can write something that passes as a thesis, then we aren’t expecting students to be knowledgeable enough in their own fields.

    Especially in undergraduate courses, it needs to be more acceptable to give students frankly hard tests of their knowledge. You can buy a paper, but you can’t (as easily) pay somebody to take a test for you. If grad students can get away with this, their department has failed hard (it could be in many places, but it’s definitely a failure on the part of the department.) Perhaps oral examinations should be more standard for all levels of education. Nobody could orally defend a thesis they hadn’t written.

    That said, I thought he wrote well – or at least smoothly and in an engaging style (I guess he would have to, with his job.)

    You know, this whole thing could be combated by setting up a company that makes online fronts for businesses like these, and then allow schools to subscribe to services where they could receive notifications when the front was contacted by one of their students. It would be relatively easy to do on a low budget – just buy a few thousand domains that are similar to those used by “legitimate” illegitimate ghost-writers and spread links around. It wouldn’t catch everybody, but it would make it riskier. This might be illegal, though.

  14. WhySharksMatter says:
    November 19, 2010 at 9:40 am

    It could be argued that your plan is “entrapment”. I don’t think that argument would win in court, but the mere existence of it may make schools not want to go down that road.

  15. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 19, 2010 at 10:02 am

    I’m concerned with where the line really is. Obviously on one end we have the student who works in complete isolation with no outside help while on the other end we have the student who just buys a completely ghostwritten paper. But what about the middle grounds.

    What about students who discuss the topic and ideas with others before writing, and then incorporates some of those ideas?

    What about students who ask for some proofreading for typos before turning it in?

    What about students who get help with sentence structure and flow from a writing studio?

    What about ESL students who hire a proofreader to clean-up the language?

    What if you’re abysmal at writing and spend weeks seeking out the right resources to help you structure a readable paper?

    What if you’re a fantastic writer with no original thought that seeks out the right resources to create a cogent argument for something?

    The way I see it, there’s two issues at stake here – one is students who can’t write well and the other is students who can’t think well. If education is a process, then both those students should be getting help both in and outside of the classroom. But at what point does ‘help’ become ‘cheating’.

    To that end, I think Dante is right in some regards, the structure of our education system is flawed. The fix shouldn’t be “how to catch cheaters more effectively” (though we should be ever-vigilant) but rather “how to structure the system so that there is less incentive to cheat.” Sadly, at a university wide level, I have no solution for either of those.

  16. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 19, 2010 at 1:22 pm

    Another similar article brought to my attention:

    http://www.thesmartset.com/article/article10100801.aspx

    sheds a little more light on this seedy occupation.

  17. WhySharksMatter says:
    November 21, 2010 at 11:05 am

    “What about students who discuss the topic and ideas with others before writing, and then incorporates some of those ideas?

    What about students who ask for some proofreading for typos before turning it in?

    What about students who get help with sentence structure and flow from a writing studio?”

    I actually encourage my students to do all of these things. I even allow them to send me drafts of papers so I can tell them if they are on the right track. I think these are a part of learning how to be a better writer, and are ethically quite distinct from just hiring someone to write a paper for you.

  18. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    November 21, 2010 at 5:38 pm

    Dave, that’s my entire point. Obviously the ghostwriter is the extreme and clearly unethical, but where exactly is the line? At what point does getting extra help become having someone else do the work for you?

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

It's 2025. Why do so many scientific journal articles still display weird when shared on social media?It's 2025. Why do so many scientific journal articles still display weird when shared on social media?May 20, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
Alberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetAlberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetOctober 16, 2012Andrew Thaler
Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.May 14, 2025Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
A quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyA quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyFebruary 7, 2024Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown