Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!

Posted on March 25, 2010April 21, 2010 By David Shiffman 10 Comments on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!
Science

As promised, here are the results of my first ever PCR. Here is some background:

I am going to be running some population genetics on sandbar shark DNA with the intention of comparing subpopulations from South Carolina with those from Virginia.

I am in the very early stages- seeing which primers work for PCR. Four primers each were tested- called A, B, C and D- on three shark DNA samples and a negative control. Ignore the samples on the bottom, they are from another student’s project. The four samples in the upper right are my negative controls.

The PCR was run yesterday (my first PCR), and I ran the gel today (my first gel).

It seems to me that Primer A is successfully copying my DNA during PCR, while B, C, and D are not.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: PCR

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 25, 2010
Next Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 26, 2010 ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Eat hagfish, work at LUMCON, clone Vaquita, question floating trash collectors, and more! Monday Morning Mega-Salvage: August 13, 2018
August 13, 2018
Science
Kary Mullis’ Eureka Moment
March 26, 2010
Science
An update on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR
March 31, 2010
Conservation
Establishing Best Practices to Minimize Waste in a Conservation Genetics Lab
November 14, 2012

10 thoughts on “WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!”

  1. Bob O'H says:
    March 25, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Pah, that’s no good. The first time I ran PCR, I even amplified DNA from my negative control. You’ve got a long way before you reach MY proficiency.

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 25, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Where’s your size standard?

  3. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 12:20 am

    Is a size standard the same thing as a “ladder”? If so, it’s on the far right.

  4. Sam says:
    March 26, 2010 at 1:41 am

    He means you don’t have any sort of measuring device in the photo so we can’t see what the scale is.

    What happened with the ladder?

  5. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 7:17 am

    Your ladder had a seizure than. You want bands, not blobs.

  6. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 9:32 am

    Undoubtedly it’s not a clean gel, and I will be trying it again early next week.

    However, is it still reasonable to conclude that primer A resulted in PCR amplifying DNA and primers B, C and D did not?

  7. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 10:08 am

    No way. Without a clear size standard you have no idea how big the fragments are. Primer pair A could have just annealed to each other and created 50 base pair primer dimers.

    The smeariness of the product also suggests you have quite a bit of non-specific amplification.

  8. Kevin Z says:
    March 26, 2010 at 11:42 am

    LOL that is the shittiest gel I’ve ever seen. I agree with SFS that with this image you cannot conclude anything. But hey, congrats on doing some science finally! Just need a little more practice and you’ll be rocking the shark DNA.

  9. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 11:45 am

    Thanks for the advice and encouragement, guys! Once I get a good looking gel, I’ll post that. This was my first one, so I was pretty happy that I didn’t burn the lab down accidentally.

  10. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    It’s actually a very good sign. As a general rule, your first gel will either be the best you ever see or the worst. Make your sacrifice to the PCR gods, google Kery Mullis, and enjoy.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

The next OpenCTD is here!The next OpenCTD is here!June 22, 2026Andrew Thaler
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Undermining the Law of the Sea. Some additional thoughts following my OpEd in the Hill.Undermining the Law of the Sea. Some additional thoughts following my OpEd in the Hill.June 22, 2026Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Ageism in the conservation job marketAgeism in the conservation job marketJune 19, 2026Chris Parsons
The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
Screaming into the void - Why your scientific paper doesn’t matterScreaming into the void - Why your scientific paper doesn’t matterJune 18, 2026Chris Parsons
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
Did monster hunters find a 120 meter long giant squid on google maps?Did monster hunters find a 120 meter long giant squid on google maps?June 17, 2016Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown