Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Everything is Crabs: How many crabs do you need to land on the moon?

Posted on March 15, 2024March 15, 2024 By Andrew Thaler
Education, Featured, Science

In 2011, researchers from Japan and the Center for Unconventional Computing in the UK asked one of the most important questions ever asked. How many crabs do you need to build a computer?

And then, they answered it.

  • Nishiyama Y, Gunji Y-P, & Adamatzky A (2012) Robust Soldier Crab Ball Gate. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1204.1749

If you want to build a computer from scratch, you must first invent a logic gate. Using soldier crabs, which have fairly predictable behavior, they were able to model a very reliable OR gate and a reasonably unreliable AND gate. It took 80 crabs to make one logic gate work. A working logic gate gets you a bit. 8 bits gets you a byte.

A carcinized computer runs on 640 crabs per byte.

For comparison, the Apollo Guidance Computer, which landed humans on the moon, had the equivalent of about 72 kilobytes. That works out to roughly 46 million crabs needed to land on the moon. That might seem like a lot, but there were about 152 million female blue crabs in the Chesapeake Bay last year. America’s largest and greatest estuary has the crab processing power of three lunar landers.

Incidentally, while building a computer out of crabs may seem weird, the Apollo Guidance Computer was, itself, a very weird computer. It use rope core memory, which means that the software to run the computer was literally woven, by hand, by looping wires around the core.

Between 2018 and 2021, approximately 10 billion crabs disappeared from the Bering Sea. That’s almost 16 megabytes lost. You need about 16 billion crabs to run Doom.

Models are fun, but we are makers and we are doers and it is simply not enough to sit back and imagine a computer made of crabs. We need to see it.

Crabs running towards outputs in the experimental logical gate. Figure from Nishiyama et al. 2013.

They did it. Crab scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should.

  • Nishiyama Y, Gunji Y-P, & Adamatzky A (2013) Collision-based computing implemented by soldier crab swarms, International Journal of Parallel, Emergent and Distributed Systems, 28:1, 67-74

All of this happened over a decade ago, leaving one to wonder “what’s new in the world of crab computing?” In a much more recent study, researchers, including one member of the original crabputer team, demonstrated that individual soldier crabs will treat small, vibrating crab robots as members of the swarm, offering a tantalizing proposition for a future cybernetic crab difference engine.


Southern Fried Science is free and ad-free. Southern Fried Science and the OpenCTD project are supported by funding from our Patreon Subscribers. If you value these resources, please consider contributing a few dollars to help keep the servers running and the coffee flowing. We have stickers.

Featured Image: Soldier Crabs marching through a mangrove.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: carcinization computers soldier crabs

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: New Deep-sea Mining Bill Introduced in Congress
Next Post: What I’m watching for at this month’s ISA meeting: How the Council responds to the NORI-D Incident ❯

Popular Posts

The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
"Why Sustainable Seafood Matters" is now available for preorder! Here's what it's about, and why I decided to write it."Why Sustainable Seafood Matters" is now available for preorder! Here's what it's about, and why I decided to write it.June 8, 2026David Shiffman
Tackling the least important debate in deep-sea mining: the desultory hyphenTackling the least important debate in deep-sea mining: the desultory hyphenJune 8, 2026Andrew Thaler
The evolution of the International Whaling Commission – from  whaling quotas to whale conservationThe evolution of the International Whaling Commission – from  whaling quotas to whale conservationJune 10, 2026Chris Parsons
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Isn’t ironic, don’t you think: dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative on World Oceans DayIsn’t ironic, don’t you think: dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative on World Oceans DayJune 9, 2026Southern Fried Science
Deep-sea Mining, Domestic Cats, Star Trek, and Ocean Exploration: Andrew's mid-year podcast round-up.Deep-sea Mining, Domestic Cats, Star Trek, and Ocean Exploration: Andrew's mid-year podcast round-up.June 6, 2026Andrew Thaler
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown