Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Playing against the slaughter rule

Posted on February 8, 2016August 11, 2016 By Andrew Thaler 1 Comment on Playing against the slaughter rule
Blogging

My middle school baseball team was bad. Really bad. Ball droppingly, bat throwingly, pitch ditchingly bad. It was a good inning if four of our batters made it to the plate. A great inning if the other team didn’t rotate through it’s entire line-up, twice. Our MVP was the kid who caught a ball. And if you think this is going to be one of those articles about how one tough player (me?) turned a bunch of scrappy underdogs into winners, it is not. I played right field, and not particularly well. We lost, often.

In peewee sports, at least in the US, there’s something called a “slaughter rule”. The slaughter rule ends the game if a team is losing by more than a certain number of points. In our case, it took something like a 20 run difference to trigger a slaughter. The slaughter rule exists so that outmatched teams don’t have to slog through 7 innings of a brutal losing streak, racking up demoralizing 112 to zero defeats. Once, we got slaughtered in the first inning.

Were it not for the slaughter rule, I would probably still be out somewhere in right field, wondering if maybe I should sign up for the Latin team next year.

We were bad and we knew it, but we still loved baseball. Even though we went into almost every game knowing we were going to lose, we still wanted to play. This was baseball, after all, and even bad baseball is good. There’s a difference between losing and being slaughtered. When you’re slaughtered, you don’t get to play anymore baseball, and we were there to play some goddamned baseball. Even knowing there was absolutely no chance we could win, we were willing to play our hearts out just to lose by a little less.

A funny thing happens when you’re repeatedly slaughtered: your objectives change. It’s not about winning, it’s about losing the best way you can.

In ocean conservation, all wins are temporary, all losses are permanent. We are perpetually playing against the slaughter rule.

This is the elephant seal in the tank for marine conservation: we aren’t playing to win, we’re playing to not get slaughtered. There are a million separate threats facing the ocean and these issues require massive societal changes that many are not willing to make. We can make small, concrete wins, and we can achieve major temporary victories, but the dirty secret is that the other teams are stacked against us and the game is rigged to prevent an upset. No matter what we do, climate change and ocean acidification alone are going to alter the ocean in ways we can’t even imagine.

This is not a cynical post. I have tremendous faith in the ocean conservation community. I know that there are lasting victories to be won. The ocean future is brighter today than it was even 10 years ago. #OceanOptimism isn’t a marketing ploy, it’s a genuine expression of our collective belief that with enough hard work by dedicated, educated, motivated players, we can eke out a win.

But blind naivety and breathless optimism do not serve the overarching goals of ocean conservation anymore than conservation colonialism. The end result is burnt out, demoralized campaigners who feel trapped in never ending cycle of loss. A Sisyphean struggle with no end in sight. And the reason that happens is because we’re playing the wrong game.

Acknowledging the existence of the Environmental Slaughter Rule is not a declaration of defeat, nor is it an expression of wanton cynicism. Acknowledging the Environmental Slaughter Rule is a recognition of the reality of the situation. It is an honest assessment of the whole field. And it is a declaration that we are neither uninformed idealists nor jaded cynics, but rational, seasoned campaigners working towards an insurmountable goal because the closer we get, the better off we are.

We are not going to win.  

In the end, we are going to lose. The Western Antarctic ice sheet is collapsing. Ocean acidification is killing marine life. The sea is rising. The globe is heating up. We’re only beginning to understand the consequences of the last two centuries of industrialization. We barely have a grasp on what the next decade will bring.

We can slow it. We cannot stop it.

Even in the face of unquestionable eventual defeat, there’s still hope that, if we fight hard enough, if we refuse to take our balls and go home, if we play hard through Just. One. More. Inning. we can lose by a little bit less.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: baseball ocean slaughter rule Team Ocean

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Fun Science FRIEDay – Bionic Eye
Next Post: What is it about mercury? Thinking about chemicals in the public discourse ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Bone-eating zombie worms, octopus overlords, old wooden ships and new woes for deep-sea mining. It’s the Monday Morning Salvage! January 1, 2018.
January 1, 2018
Weekly Salvage
Frisky Anglerfish, Persistent Aquatic Living Sensors, Make for the Planet Borneo, Sea Cucumber Mafia, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: March 26, 2018
March 26, 2018
Uncategorized
Fun Science FRIEDay – The Moby Dick of Sperm Whale Encounters
April 17, 2015
Uncategorized
Core Themes for 2012: A renewed sense of wonder
January 27, 2012

One thought on “Playing against the slaughter rule”

  1. Monica Goldberg says:
    February 8, 2016 at 10:39 am

    What exactly do you mean by losing? I’m not ready to accept that we’re just going to lose by less. Obviously the ecosystem is going to change materially. But what does success look like despite that? I think it means there are still viable populations of fish and biological diversity in the oceans. Species have adapted to climate change across millennia. There will not be the same species in the same places. But there will be something and through our work we can make that something be more diverse and beautiful and resistant to the worst climate change has to bring. It’s distinctly possible that I have this view because I don’t know as much about climate science as you do. But this is the belief that I cling to in order to feel like I’m not just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic all day.

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Considering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceConsidering writing a popular science book? Here's my adviceJuly 7, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?May 29, 2024David Shiffman
AuthorsOctober 27, 2013Administrator
Please don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new  guide to responsible shark divingPlease don't ride sharks, and other great tips from the new guide to responsible shark divingMarch 12, 2017David Shiffman
The Urgency is Artificial. My comment on the proposed permitting of deep-sea mining leases off American SamoaThe Urgency is Artificial. My comment on the proposed permitting of deep-sea mining leases off American SamoaJuly 1, 2025Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown