Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Robots Versus Aliens – Anticipatory conservation in technology-drive initiatives

Posted on September 30, 2015September 29, 2015 By Andrew Thaler
Conservation, Science

This week, I and a team of marine ecologist, explorers, and ocean technologists published Robots as vectors for marine invasions: best practices for minimizing transmission of invasive species via observation-class ROVs. This paper, conceived and largely produced during the ROV2PNG Marine Science Short Course in Papua New Guinea, represent the current best practices for minimizing or eliminating the spread of invasive species via portable, low-cost underwater robots.

Zebra mussels observed via OpenROV. Photo by author.
Zebra mussels observed via OpenROV. Photo by author.

Species invasion, particularly in the ocean, is a huge problem. Invasive species are ruthlessly good at out-competing native fauna. Without any natural predators, they can flourish, causing massive, irreparable damage to marine ecosystems. As scientists, explorers, and conservationist, we have to be proactive in ensuring that our actions don’t negatively impact the ecosystems we’re trying to save. Our guidelines are simple, but effective, and, most importantly, easy to follow.

  1. Educate yourself about species invasions generally and specifically about current issues in the area you’re working.
  2. Inspect your gear.
  3. Soak your gear in freshwater between dives.
  4. Soak your gear in weak bleach between expeditions.
  5. Avoid moving your equipment between geographic regions, when possible.

Technology can be a powerful tool in the aid of conservation. Around the world, people are using low-cost robotics to count elephants, detect poachers, protect tortoises, even seek-and-destroy invasive sea stars. As I discuss over at Motherboard, these robots are a transformative component of 21st century marine science and conservation, they fundamentally reshape the way we interact with the ocean. And with the explosive success of the latest OpenROV launch, there are about to be a lot more robots in the water. This is a good thing. The more eyes we have in the sea, the more people that actively contribute to ocean exploration, the more people with access to the tools necessary to explore, study, and understand our oceans and how they are changing, the better off we will all be.

Technology comes at a cost, and it is often an environmental one. We pull rare and precious metals from the earth in order to fabricate these amazing machines. We burn ancient carbon to power this world. We fabricate more and more plastic, a material designed to last forever that is often used once, then discarded. More directly, we create great chains of social connective tissue that link the world together, both physically and electronically.

I want to connect humans to the ocean through underwater robots that are cheap, capable, and easy to use. Every new connection creates a new vector for species invasion.

Robots as vectors for marine invasions is the first peer-reviewed scientific publication to use the OpenROV as its foundation. This is important. In the increasingly technology-driven conservation initiative of the 21st century, we need to take an anticipatory, rather than reactionary approach to the potential impacts of new technology. If the story of the last century of conservation is about reacting to the damage caused by human advancement, the next century must be about harnessing our collective experience to anticipate the potential impacts that new methods, new technologies, and even entirely new industries will have on the environment. We should prepare for, rather than react to, environmental harm.

We recognized early on that the one of the greatest assets of the OpenROV, it’s portability, is also it’s greatest potential for environmental harm. A carelessly packed ROV could carry invasive species around the world. So we present these guidelines, not as a response to any incident, but in anticipation of this potential, and an attempt to minimize that possibility. It is my hope that, by setting the precedent early, we can more fully harness the vast capabilities that these robots offer while minimizing the potential for environmental harm.

Call to Action

If you’re a microROV user, whether OpenROV, Fathom, VideoRay, or any of myriad observation-class options, follow these guidelines, incorporate them into your training, add them to your pre- and post-dive checklists.

If you’re an NGO, government agency, academic institution, or other organization using microROVs in any capacity, require your employees to adhere to these guidelines.

If you’re a reviewer, editor, or publisher of scientific manuscripts, require that any papers that use microROV explicitly state that they have adhered to these guidelines.

If you’re a manufacture of microROVs, include these guidelines in information packets shipped out with new microROVs.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: invasive species OpenROV

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Polar bear feast on seabird eggs is reason we can’t have nice things
Next Post: Fun Science FRIEDay – Dude, I’m Glowing! ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Mining historic shipwrecks for lead and other old things from the bottom of the sea. Also, Robots! Weekly Salvage: November 4, 2019
November 4, 2019
Uncategorized
Thursday Afternoon Dredging: March 9th, 2017
March 9, 2017
Weekly Salvage
Space whales. Space. Whales. SPAAAAACE WHAAAAALES! Weekly Salvage: October 21, 2019
October 21, 2019
Weekly Salvage
Big storms, lost ships, fake shrimp, and more! Weekly Salvage: September 9, 2019
September 9, 2019

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
For when the madness ends: a 5-point plan for getting conservation back on track in the USFor when the madness ends: a 5-point plan for getting conservation back on track in the USJuly 9, 2026Southern Fried Science
Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?Critically Endangered sawfish are spinning in circles until they die. What the heck is going on?May 29, 2024David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Oh Hell No: Ten Years of SharkNadoOh Hell No: Ten Years of SharkNadoAugust 16, 2023David Shiffman
Blood and Brains - can vampires survive a zombie apocalypse?October 30, 2009Andrew Thaler
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
What goes up must come down: the toxic hangover from the Freedom 250 fireworksWhat goes up must come down: the toxic hangover from the Freedom 250 fireworksJuly 6, 2026Chris Parsons
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown