Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Secrets and Sulfur at the Morehead City Port

Posted on July 21, 2011July 21, 2011 By Andrew Thaler 9 Comments on Secrets and Sulfur at the Morehead City Port
Conservation
Proposed site. Wetlands indicated in purple. From the PCS Phosphate EA.

The news caught us by surprise. PCS Phospate, a division of Potash Corp. and one of the largest suppliers of fertilizer in the world is planing to build a Sulfur processing plant in Morehead City. Seemingly overnight, it had grown from a few rumors to an announcement that the final permitting and funding process was already underway. Initial planning began almost a year ago, and an environmental assessment was produce in in December 2010, but at no point during this year of closed door meetings was there ever a public review. The first official notice occurred when an adjacent landowner was informed of the expansion.

The proposal calls for the construction of a new facility that can convert formed solid sulfur into molten sulfur, store the molten sulfur, and then transport it by barge to the Aurora Phosphate Mine in Beaufort County, NC. Once complete, the boilers would be able to produce 5,000 tons of liquid sulfur per day. Molten sulfur would be transported by barge via the inter-coastal waterway. This would require a 400 ft expansion of the existing docks to accommodate additional barges.

Molten sulfur is essential for the production of sulfuric acid, which is then used to manufacture phosphoric acid from phosphate. The phosphoric acid is a key ingredient in commercial fertilizers. Molten sulfur is produce by melting formed solid sulfur at 235 F and running the resultant liquid through a filtration process. The process also produces Sulfur Dioxide, a major air pollutant and one of the primary agents that causes acid rain as well as respiratory problems. The current OSHA permissible exposure limit is 5 ppm, although industry health and safety organization recommend short term exposures of no more than 0.25 ppm.

According to the EA:

Major activities and site improvements include the construction of two 2,500 tons per day sulfur melters, the minor modification of the existing conveyor gallery, the construction of two new storage dome structures with 90,000 ton total storage capacity and with a future third dome footprint allowance, the construction of two new 15,000 ton liquid sulfur storage tanks, and the construction of two new boilers and relocation of one existing boiler from Radio Island for melting and maintaining the sulfur as a liquid in the storage tanks (Figure 3). The two storage domes, base, conveyors, and platforms will be approximately 32,800 square feet and 152 feet tall (160 feet above sea level). The boiler building will be approximately 6,400 square feet and 27 feet tall. The control room and lab will be approximately 1,600 square feet and 15 feet tall. The fire water tank and pump house will be 300 square feet and 15 feet tall. There will also be two roof structures totaling 3,500 square feet, approximately 35 feet tall over the sulfur filters. The sulfur filters will filter impurities from the solid sulfur. The Berth One area will be upgraded to enable molten sulfur to be off-loaded from ships and pumped to new molten storage tanks. Piping, valves, and a jib crane will be installed to facilitate connection to on-board discharge piping. Sulfur piping will be installed from Berth One to the new molten sulfur storage tanks. The total disturbed land area for the main process areas described above and the control room and parking is approximately 3.8 acres.

source

It should be made clear at this point that an Environmental Assessment (EA) is not the same as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). An EA is a preliminary investigation for major issues that would prevent a project. It also consists of small scale site assessments for potential groundwater and soil contamination, among other factors. An EIS is a thorough and rigorous exploration of all potential environmental damages that could result from both the project construction and as a result of industrial processes and includes mitigation and remediation strategies. Although Potash Corp has already declared an intent to begin construction as soon as possible, no EIS has been conducted. Without any environmental impact statement, public review of the environmental assessment, or consultation with any environmental scientists in a county that boasts not one but five marine laboratories representing federal and state governments and public and private universities, with decades of experience working in the proposed area, the EA concludes that:

“The proposed project is not anticipated to negatively impact the environment. “

Protesters. Image from Carteret County News-Times

It’s possible that the project may not negatively impact the environment, but given the information they’ve provided, along with the EA, I would not be able to reach that conclusion, and I doubt PCS Phosphate would, either.

Public opposition has be swift. Citizen groups have already mobilized to petition the Governor, local councils have vocally condemned the project, and even the US Army has stated that the construction could compromise vessel operations. Complaints range from concern for the environment, to damage to fisheries, to loss of tourist revenue.

At this point, the future of the project, and the impact on the environment is uncertain. Over the next few days we’ll dissect the issues at hand, and attempt to place this project and the politics involved in a broader context. While we are not necessarily opposed to new industrial developments, it should be obvious that we are biased in favor of socially and environmentally responsible development, not half-executed assessments conducted in secret.

You can keep up to date with recent news at http://cleancounty.org/.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: EA EIS Morehead City North Carolina PCS Phosphate PotashCorp Sulfur

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: World’s oldest known bonnethead shark captured in South Carolina!
Next Post: Six question for PCS Phosphate regrading the proposed sulfur melting facility at the Morehead City Port ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
North Carolina Speaker of the House, Thom Tillis, Celebrates Independence Day by saying “Frack You” to Democracy
July 3, 2012
Uncategorized
Charlie and the Adventure: 3 months of a Charles Darwin doll wandering around the world
August 24, 2010
Uncategorized
Sharks and Global Norming in North Carolina
January 14, 2016
Weekly Salvage
High octopuses don’t love you back, sextants in space, protect our ocean monuments, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: September 24, 2018
September 24, 2018

9 thoughts on “Secrets and Sulfur at the Morehead City Port”

  1. Patricia Frank says:
    July 21, 2011 at 7:29 pm

    Thanks for your excellent coverage of this sulfur fiasco. Deals done in darkness and behind closed doors don’t look so good when the light shines on them.

    The community is galvanized into action and will not rest until this sulfur deal being foisted upon them by some politicians and a multi-national corporation has been put to rest.

    There are no benefits whatsoever in having this toxin-spewing development in our midst.

    As Ginny Costlow said, PotashCorp. will take the profits and leave their toxins behind.”

    We say no to molten sulfur. PotashCorp: Get your ash out of here.

    For notification of meetings, citizens commentary and more, try: http://www.vibrant village.com

    Please keep up your coverage. We need all the help we can get in this David versus Goliath fight.

    We’re fighting for our lives.

  2. David Jones says:
    July 22, 2011 at 9:38 am

    Well said. We have a real Gem in the Crystal Coast in which we must protect against exploitation by firms such as POTASH. I am just surprised our NC Governmental officials on the Ports Commission and other areas with knowledge have let this get so far without informing the public. I think the Governors Office should consider replacing them all!

  3. Jerry says:
    July 22, 2011 at 10:26 am

    What about CAMA permits? Any structure built with in so many some feet of the waterway is suppose to go thru a CAMA permit process and have an impervious surface restrictions.

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    July 22, 2011 at 10:35 am

    The CAMA permit is the final permit they need before construction begins and I’ve been informed through the grape-vine that they’ve be asked to revise and resubmit.

  5. Patricia Frank says:
    July 22, 2011 at 3:04 pm

    Cleancoast.org is the local grassroots organization that’s working to fight this smokestack molten sulfur manufacturing plant.

    Please go to their web site and voice your opinion, sign the petition to keep this stinker off the Crystal Coast–and find contacts of state officials who need to hear from you.

    Save the Crystal Coast and say no to the Sulfur Coast.

  6. Guy Robert says:
    July 22, 2011 at 7:10 pm

    The CAMA permit is only for the dredging necessary to widen the barge berth–nothing else. All other permits were granted as “extensions” of those all ready existing, since PCS stated that they were only expanding ongoing operations. You define “expanding” for me. This is a whole new process and use. More smoke and mirrors.

  7. Tony Dockery says:
    July 23, 2011 at 11:58 am

    Follow the money ..who in the local government has been paid off to help them sneak in here and pollute our state..sounds pretty much like some corruption in local government…they need to be identified and brought to justice…..look outside of the box..and inside..

  8. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    July 23, 2011 at 1:36 pm

    Gov. Perdue issues stand still order – temporarily halts construction – http://bit.ly/okudu7

  9. rick carroll says:
    July 24, 2011 at 1:30 pm

    We hold our nose at the stink, and our elected officials’ mendacity and oppose this blatant intrusion on the last remaining raw seacoast, Cape Lookout National Seashore, Rachel Carson Nature Reserve, Shackleford Banks where wild horses wander and sea turtles haul out, and other endangered species, which now includes us, live in nature.

    After we toos out the blundering fools who approved the noxious enterprise in secret and find out who’s behind the repeal of the state law intended to save our coast, we need to insure this terroristic threat dies in full public view.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.October 16, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Florida angler catches (and likely kills) Endangered great hammerhead sharkFlorida angler catches (and likely kills) Endangered great hammerhead sharkFebruary 13, 2012David Shiffman
Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?March 29, 2011David Shiffman
Full video of injured shark shows numerous natural injuriesFull video of injured shark shows numerous natural injuriesMay 3, 2011David Shiffman
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Walking Backwards Into the Future: Applying Indigenous Knowledge to Deep Sea MiningWalking Backwards Into the Future: Applying Indigenous Knowledge to Deep Sea MiningFebruary 5, 2026Angelo Villagomez
I'm getting married! Want to honor us? Here are some great charities you can donate to.I'm getting married! Want to honor us? Here are some great charities you can donate to.January 23, 2026David Shiffman
What does the new species of hammerhead mean for shark science and conservation?What does the new species of hammerhead mean for shark science and conservation?November 11, 2013David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown