Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Sharks and CITES

Posted on March 15, 2010April 21, 2010 By David Shiffman 1 Comment on Sharks and CITES
Conservation, Science

The  15th meeting of the Convention on the International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, also known as CITES, has begun, and representatives of 175 countries are meeting in Doha, Qatar. CITES rules have the power to make international trade of plant and animal species illegal, which has enormous significance for their conservation. 8 shark species have been proposed for CITES protection under appendix II- oceanic whitetip sharks, porbeagle sharks, spiny dogfish (commonly used for fish and chips in the UK), dusky sharks, three species of hammerheads (great, smooth, and scalloped), and my study animal the sandbar shark.

The Save Our Seas Foundation has a detailed description of each shark species, and explains why these shark species should be protected under CITES Appendix II:

All eight of these shark species are:

  • Subject to persistent demand that drives targeted fisheries and retention of bycatch
  • Traded internationally in substantial quantities
  • Included in the lowest productivity category (intrinsic rate of population increase <0.14) under criteria developed by the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) for CITES listing of commercially exploited aquatic species
  • Inadequately managed by most countries, and
  • Not subject to fishing limits under any regional fisheries management organization (RFMO).

Listing these shark species under CITES Appendix II is:

  • Essential for ensuring that international trade is held to sustainable levels
  • Complementary to fisheries management efforts
  • Key to improving data on the nature and extent of fisheries and trade

The shark proposals include solid justification that the species meet the CITES criteria for listing.

42 proposals are being debated at CITES in between now and March 25th. Many of them deal with marine species, including bluefin tuna.

If you want to learn more about CITES, self-described shark warrior Lesley Rochat is attending CITES on behalf of the Shark Research Institute and the AfriOceans Conservation Alliance. She is blogging her experiences, and you can follow them here.

I’ve been told to expect a vote on the shark proposals Wednesday or Thursday, and I’ll let you know if they pass.

~WhySharksMatter

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: CITES sharks

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: The Cove, Dolphins, and Mercury
Next Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 16, 2010 ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Deep-sea mining goes to court, a year in climate reporting, oyster-adorned singers, and more! The Monday Morning Salvage: December 11, 2017.
December 11, 2017
Uncategorized
Florida releases draft land-based shark fishing regulations
December 11, 2018
Education
Ocean Kickstarter of the Month: Meet Norman the Nurse Shark
October 6, 2015
Popular Culture
I was the entertainment at a 5th birthday party: A new favorite science communication gig
January 24, 2024

One thought on “Sharks and CITES”

  1. Lee Webber says:
    March 17, 2010 at 1:35 am

    Dave — this is a great site! Hollywood has given sharks such a bad rap. Without them the ocean would be a more grungy place in which to dive.

    Esta,

    Lee

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

At least 74 practicing shark researchers: How a silly thing I said online raised thousands for conservationAt least 74 practicing shark researchers: How a silly thing I said online raised thousands for conservationFebruary 26, 2025David Shiffman
Why the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesWhy the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesSeptember 5, 2026Ali Gaster
Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?March 29, 2011David Shiffman
5 things I learned helping to reassess the global conservation status of every species of tuna and billfish5 things I learned helping to reassess the global conservation status of every species of tuna and billfishSeptember 15, 2026David Shiffman
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
Getting a sense of porpoiseJanuary 20, 2009Andrew Thaler
How to build a canoe from scratch on a graduate student stipendHow to build a canoe from scratch on a graduate student stipendApril 17, 2010Andrew Thaler
13 wrong things about sharks that conservation advocates should stop saying in 2013 (and what they should say instead)December 27, 2012David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
The Trump Administration’s latest attack on endangered speciesThe Trump Administration’s latest attack on endangered speciesSeptember 17, 2026Ali Gaster
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown