Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Great white shark movements at Geyser Rock

Posted on September 3, 2014December 8, 2014 By Michelle Jewell
Science

michelleMichelle Wcisel is a Zoologist specialized in predator/prey behaivour and the Scientific Communicator for EDNA Interactive.  She has spent the past 4 years studying the behaviour of white sharks and Cape fur seals at Geyser Rock, ‘Shark Alley’, South Africa.  

 

Animal movement is often shaped by natural barriers; a fish can’t leave the river it swims in, a tortoise is going to struggle to climb a cliff face, and a pangolin can’t swim across the sea.  These barriers come quite naturally to the animals, yet researchers have often struggled to account for these constraints in movement analysis, particularly when it comes to estimating home range (or ‘Utilization Distributions’, UDs).  Unfortunately, the few solutions that have attempted to account for barriers are often incredibly complicated without providing much improvement overall, so previous studies have been forced to simply ‘clip out’ the parts of the estimate that extend over these inconceivable areas (i.e. Heupel et al. 2004; Hammerschlag et al. 2012; Jewell et al. 2012).

White sharks movements are particularly interesting when it comes to this conundrum, as they are not only shaped by boundaries; the species is attracted to barriers every year when they seek out seal colonies to forage or move inshore to beaches (Kock et al. 2013; Towner et al. 2013).  Our study area proved to be particularly challenging due to structures such as Shark Alley – a roughly 250m wide channel of water between Dyer Island and Geyser Rock (the seal colony).  The white sharks we manually tracked (VIDEO) spent the majority of their time in the alley, therefore if we used the traditional method of clipping the UD, we would have lost the majority of the data we fought long and hard to collect!  Traditional methods are also unable to account for movement (as in Jewell et al. 2012), which results in UDs clumping in areas of high use (or high tag activity) and neglecting important migration corridors between them. This is when we began to look for suitable alternatives to accurately project what the white sharks at Dyer Island and Geyser Rock were up to without sacrificing the data.
Simon Benhamou’s work on Movement Based Kernel Density Estimates (MKDEs) was our starting point (Benhamou & Cornélis 2010). MKDEs create UD estimates that make use of positions collected in succession within an animal’s track and consider the time taken between positions to build the spatial density of the range.  Additionally, this method can account for boundaries defined within the range before the analysis and will shape the UD around them.  Here’s an example of traditional method vs. MKDE that we used on Shark5’s track.  You can see that the MKDE does a great job of projecting the movement of Shark5’s UD around the seal colony (right), whereas in the traditional method, we would have lost the data that the kernel places over the island’s east side (left).

1

We also had a great opportunity to examine how the sharks move around seal colonies by comparing our results to those ~300km to the east in Mossel Bay. Johnson et al. (2009) found that white sharks would visit the seal colony during the restricted time periods of dawn and dusk hours, and spend all other times patrolling near shore reef systems far from the colony. At Geyser Rock, we found sharks remained close to the seal colony during all daylight hours, often right inside Shark Alley. The only time we actively tracked sharks away from the seal colony was during the night, when they would patrol deep offshore reefs.  The only exceptions to this were the few occasions we tracked at night under a clear sky with a bright moon. During these conditions, sharks once again stayed close to Geyser Rock, patrolling to the south of the island rather than move to the offshore reefs.  This provides evidence towards the hypothesis that white sharks detect seals primarily through vision, and made for some very interesting tracking nights!

2

We were surprised to find that sharks behaved so differently here, especially considering that Mossel Bay and Geyser Rock share some of the same individual white sharks!  What could be driving these differences?  Well, we’ll have to leave you in suspense for now, but our infographic below contains a clue…
As for the future, we will now attempt to apply MKDE analyses to SPOT data collected from the South African OCEARCH expedition to identify important hotspots and migration corridors for white sharks throughout the southern Africa/Indian Ocean areas.  With any luck, this future work will serve as a backbone for white shark management in the region and as an important test of the method for trans-oceanic species.

 


Research Conducted by Marine Dynamics a Shark Cage Diving Operator in Gansbaai South Africa

References:

Heupel, M. R., Simpfendorfer, C. A., & Hueter, R. E. (2004). Estimation of shark home ranges using passive monitoring techniques. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 71(2), 135-142.

Hammerschlag, N., Gallagher, A. J., Wester, J., Luo, J., & Ault, J. S. (2012). Don’t bite the hand that feeds: assessing ecological impacts of provisioning ecotourism on an apex marine predator. Functional Ecology, 26(3), 567-576.

Jewell, O. J., Johnson, R. L., Gennari, E., & Bester, M. N. (2013). Fine scale movements and activity areas of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) in Mossel Bay, South Africa. Environmental biology of fishes, 96(7), 881-894.

Kock, A., O’Riain, M. J., Mauff, K., Meÿer, M., Kotze, D., & Griffiths, C. (2013). Residency, habitat use and sexual segregation of white sharks, Carcharodon carcharias in False Bay, South Africa. PloS one, 8(1), e55048.

Towner, A. V., Underhill, L. G., Jewell, O. J., & Smale, M. J. (2013). Environmental influences on the abundance and sexual composition of white sharks Carcharodon carcharias in Gansbaai, South Africa. PloS one, 8(8), e71197.

Benhamou, S., & Cornélis, D. (2010). Incorporating movement behavior and barriers to improve kernel home range space use estimates. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 74(6), 1353-1360.

Johnson, R., Bester, M. N., Dudley, S. F., Oosthuizen, W. H., Meÿer, M., Hancke, L., & Gennari, E. (2009). Coastal swimming patterns of white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) at Mossel Bay, South Africa. Environmental biology of fishes, 85(3), 189-200.

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: great white shark michelle wcisel oliver jewell

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Breaching Blue Chapter 2: Sisters of the Reef
Next Post: Breaching Blue Chapter 3: In the Heart of the Reef ❯

You may also like

Science
Sharks are not to blame for increases in California Sea Otter deaths
September 17, 2010
Conservation
Check out “Expedition Great White” on the National Geographic Channel!
June 4, 2010
Conservation
What Jaws Teaches Us About Scientists and the Future of Shark Bite Politics
December 12, 2014
Conservation
Have you heard the good news about shark populations? Shark population increases are cause for #OceanOptimism
February 28, 2018

Popular Posts

Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.December 1, 2025David Shiffman
Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.December 3, 2025Andrew Thaler
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
The Trouble with Teacup PigsThe Trouble with Teacup PigsOctober 14, 2012Andrew Thaler
What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.November 20, 2025Andrew Thaler
2025: My year in writing, public speaking, and media interviews2025: My year in writing, public speaking, and media interviewsDecember 3, 2025David Shiffman
Urea and Shark OsmoregulationUrea and Shark OsmoregulationNovember 15, 2010David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
How tiny satellites are tracking marine wildlifeDecember 1, 2025Andrew Thaler
Build a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseBuild a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseJuly 21, 2015Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown