Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

The Gentle Tasaday: An anthropological hoax

Posted on September 6, 2010September 7, 2010 By Bluegrass Blue Crab 7 Comments on The Gentle Tasaday: An anthropological hoax
Uncategorized

In 1971, a group of people known as the Tasaday were discovered on a remote island of the Phillipines known as Mindanao. They wore leafy loincloths and subsisted off what the forest could provide, possessing no knowledge of tobacco, corn, rice, or domesticated animals. They spoke a new dialect of Malay-Philipino language that included no word for outsiders, war, weapon, or enemy, giving them the title ‘The Gentle Tasaday’. The family unit was nuclear and the community has no formal organization or government outside of some loose food-sharing networks.

Today, Tasaday life is way different and matches more modern tribal life in the Phillipines, as documented on their website. The question is, however, whether this modernization was normal development post-contact or whether there was a hoax involved.

Picture taken in 1972, found on http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth210/tashyp.html

A hunter named Dafal first discovered the tribe while trapping with his father. He returned, leading Philipino official Manuel Elizalde, Jr, where they were met by 26 of the Tasaday. As a result of the discovery of these very primitive people, then president Marcos set aside 19000 acres of surrounding dense forest lands as a reserve. Access was restricted and all visitors had to be escorted by Elizalde.

After governance shifted under a new president, a Swiss team came to visit by themselves and discovered the Tasaday living in huts wearing t-shirts and blue jeans. They had apparently come from two other local tribes that had been connected to modern amenities for years, which they continued to trade with for cultivated food and more modern tools. They had been asked by Elizalde and other officials to remove their clothing and given fake stone tools to make them look more primitive. In addition, their language was really a dialect of Cotabato Manobo, spoken by most surrounding people.

Elizalde fled the Phillipines with $35 million of nonprofit money raised for the Tasaday. He died in Costa Rica addicted to drugs and impoverished. At least on the part of Elizalde, there was a hoax perpetrated.

On a more philosophical level, the Tasaday raised many questions about anthropological methods. Here’s the two big ones:

– How does one account for the masking effects of a tyrannical government and restricted access? In this case, that is what allowed Elizalde to dupe the scientists.

– What happens when a tribe asks for technology or an easy cure is available for a disease they’re suffering from? Does the anthropologist’s ethic lie in decreasing suffering or leaving their study culture as unperturbed as possible?

~Bluegrass Blue Crab

sources: 1987 NY Times article from right after hoax discovery, Time article from 1971 contact, and a follow-up 2002 BBC report, OSU website that admits both sides could be true

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: BBC hoax New York Times Philippines pseudoscience Tasaday

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Our favorite sea monsters – Steller’s Sea Ape (#7)
Next Post: Greenwashing – Is there really a sustainable Orange Roughy fishery? ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
365 days of Darwin: September 9, 2010 (5/7)
September 9, 2010
Uncategorized
The Aquatic Ape Hypothesis
September 9, 2010
Uncategorized
An Ocean of Pseudoscience Week Recap
September 11, 2010
Science
Chemistry of the Great Big Blue: Nutrients
September 7, 2010

7 thoughts on “The Gentle Tasaday: An anthropological hoax”

  1. WhySharksMatter says:
    September 6, 2010 at 11:13 am

    “Does the anthropologist’s ethic lie in decreasing suffering or leaving their study culture as unperturbed as possible?”

    Great question, Amy.

    When I studied abroad in Australia, we visited an Aborigine cultural center. A friend of mine was horrified to learn that most modern Aboriginals by their food at the grocery store and visit hospitals when they are sick- she always thought of them as living off the land and practicing traditional medicine. When she voiced this concern to our guide, he was shocked and asked her if she really wanted children to die of curable diseases so that her view of traditional cultures could be maintained. It was a very eye-opening discussion.

  2. Bluegrass Blue Crab says:
    September 6, 2010 at 11:37 am

    You’ve touched on the larger debate about the narrative of traditional systems: the romanticized idea of traditional livelihoods. Not only does that idea often leave out the challenges associated with such a lifestyle, but it ignores the many traditional societies that did not lead such a virtuous life (in terms of environment, peace, or otherwise).

  3. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    September 6, 2010 at 11:41 am

    Wait, you mean native cultures aren’t all exactly like Avatar and Dances with Wolves?

  4. Bob Coouttie says:
    September 8, 2010 at 11:45 pm

    I would strongly recommend reading “Invented Eden” by Robin Hemsley. The Tasaday were not a hoax, although they were certainly misrepresented – they were never as isolated as they were said to be, for instance. The Tasaday’s own story of taking to the hills to avoid a small pox epidemic actually stands up very well – and is supported by independent evidence from the Spanish era that would not have been easily available at the time.

    By the way, Elizalde died in the Philippines in May 1997 of cancer and was far from impoverished. Where did the nonsense about dying in Costa Rica come from?

  5. Bluegrass Blue Crab says:
    September 9, 2010 at 9:03 am

    Thanks for the book suggestion! It was actually really hard to find comprehensive sources, not just newspaper clippings from the episode.

    I never fully said this, but the Tasaday community exists. It’s just the representation to the outside world that was a hoax – they weren’t their own tribe disconnected from everyone, just a remote community like many others around the world.

    By the way, where did your info on Elizalde come from? Mine was from the BBC, which I consider a reputable source, but there are certainly lots of versions of this story flying around.

  6. Bob Couttie says:
    September 9, 2010 at 9:45 am

    A friend of mine, a pleasant lady called Amy Rara nursed Elizalde in the last few weeks of his life.

    Hemsley’s book is a must read. Hemsley had no particular commitment to any view of the Tasaday.

    The Tasaday oral history says that they were in isolation for six generations. At 20-25 years for a generation that would place it in the late 19th century. Linguistic analysts who listened to recordings the Tasaday talking estimated that they can separated form Cotabato Manobo dialect for something over 100 years, placing the separation at around the same time as the Tasaday themselves said.

    The clincher for me was a note in Ken De Bevoise’s Agent of Apocalypse, about historical epidemics in the Philippines, which I was reading in relation to other research I was doing. There was a serious smallpox epidemic in Cotabato in 1871, the only one, spread there by a boat from Zamboanga and recorded by the local Spanish medical officer.

    I’ve since discovered that there is further evidence pinpointing the year of separation connected with disease but has not yet been published.

  7. heidy says:
    July 26, 2011 at 11:03 pm

    i will research related topic about them..

Comments are closed.

Recent Popular Posts

It's 2025. Why do so many scientific journal articles still display weird when shared on social media?It's 2025. Why do so many scientific journal articles still display weird when shared on social media?May 20, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
Alberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetAlberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetOctober 16, 2012Andrew Thaler
Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.Deep-sea Mining: It’s science fiction, until it isn’t.May 14, 2025Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
A quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyA quick and dirty guide to making custom feeds on BlueskyFebruary 7, 2024Andrew Thaler
Here's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationHere's what I teach my students about finding jobs in marine biology and conservationApril 10, 2024David Shiffman
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown