Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!

Posted on March 25, 2010April 21, 2010 By David Shiffman 10 Comments on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!
Science

As promised, here are the results of my first ever PCR. Here is some background:

I am going to be running some population genetics on sandbar shark DNA with the intention of comparing subpopulations from South Carolina with those from Virginia.

I am in the very early stages- seeing which primers work for PCR. Four primers each were tested- called A, B, C and D- on three shark DNA samples and a negative control. Ignore the samples on the bottom, they are from another student’s project. The four samples in the upper right are my negative controls.

The PCR was run yesterday (my first PCR), and I ran the gel today (my first gel).

It seems to me that Primer A is successfully copying my DNA during PCR, while B, C, and D are not.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: PCR

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 25, 2010
Next Post: 365 Days of Darwin: March 26, 2010 ❯

You may also like

Science
An update on WhySharksMatter’s first PCR
March 31, 2010
Weekly Salvage
Monday Morning Salvage: February 20, 2017
February 20, 2017
Science
Kary Mullis’ Eureka Moment
March 26, 2010
Science
WhySharksMatter’s 2nd PCR
April 5, 2010

10 thoughts on “WhySharksMatter’s first PCR!”

  1. Bob O'H says:
    March 25, 2010 at 3:52 pm

    Pah, that’s no good. The first time I ran PCR, I even amplified DNA from my negative control. You’ve got a long way before you reach MY proficiency.

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 25, 2010 at 5:49 pm

    Where’s your size standard?

  3. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 12:20 am

    Is a size standard the same thing as a “ladder”? If so, it’s on the far right.

  4. Sam says:
    March 26, 2010 at 1:41 am

    He means you don’t have any sort of measuring device in the photo so we can’t see what the scale is.

    What happened with the ladder?

  5. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 7:17 am

    Your ladder had a seizure than. You want bands, not blobs.

  6. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 9:32 am

    Undoubtedly it’s not a clean gel, and I will be trying it again early next week.

    However, is it still reasonable to conclude that primer A resulted in PCR amplifying DNA and primers B, C and D did not?

  7. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 10:08 am

    No way. Without a clear size standard you have no idea how big the fragments are. Primer pair A could have just annealed to each other and created 50 base pair primer dimers.

    The smeariness of the product also suggests you have quite a bit of non-specific amplification.

  8. Kevin Z says:
    March 26, 2010 at 11:42 am

    LOL that is the shittiest gel I’ve ever seen. I agree with SFS that with this image you cannot conclude anything. But hey, congrats on doing some science finally! Just need a little more practice and you’ll be rocking the shark DNA.

  9. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 26, 2010 at 11:45 am

    Thanks for the advice and encouragement, guys! Once I get a good looking gel, I’ll post that. This was my first one, so I was pretty happy that I didn’t burn the lab down accidentally.

  10. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 26, 2010 at 12:29 pm

    It’s actually a very good sign. As a general rule, your first gel will either be the best you ever see or the worst. Make your sacrifice to the PCR gods, google Kery Mullis, and enjoy.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Tangier, an Island out of Time.Tangier, an Island out of Time.July 3, 2017Andrew Thaler
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
How close did the world's first deep-sea mining come to the dredging the world's largest cold-water coral reef?How close did the world's first deep-sea mining come to the dredging the world's largest cold-water coral reef?March 17, 2026Andrew Thaler
Urea and Shark OsmoregulationUrea and Shark OsmoregulationNovember 15, 2010David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Join Me at Upwell: A Wave of Ocean Justice — Our Fourth Year!Join Me at Upwell: A Wave of Ocean Justice — Our Fourth Year!March 24, 2026Angelo Villagomez
Alberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetAlberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetOctober 16, 2012Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Build a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseBuild a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseJuly 21, 2015Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown