Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

What can Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs teach us about ecology, sustainability and conservation?

Posted on December 21, 2014 By David Shiffman
Conservation, Popular Culture

Cloudy_with_a_chance_of_meatballs_theataposterMy family loves to watch movies, which presents a problem during the few times we’re all together: there are very few good movies that none of us have already seen. This past Thanksgiving, we resolved that dilemma by watching some “based on a true story” garbage starring Nicholas Cage and the star of High School Musical, a plot-less but action packed shoot ’em up starring the governator and Sawyer from Lost, and “Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs.”

Based on a popular children’s book, Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs tells the story of Flint Lockwood, a young inventor who keeps trying to make life better for people in his small island town of Swallow Falls. His inventions always backfire, including the titular invention that makes the sky rain food. In the sequel, which I watched this past weekend because shut up I enjoyed the first one leave me alone, we learn that some of the food has become sentient.  Swallow Falls is now home to a unique ecosystem that includes watermel-ephants, taco-diles, fla-mangos, and many other hybrids called foodimals. In addition to featuring some of the best puns I’ve ever seen, these movies also raise some interesting questions about ecology, sustainability and conservation.

The reason that Flint tries to invent something that can create any kind of food  is because his town has fallen on hard times. Their economy is mostly based on sardine fishing, and the global market collapses because “everyone realized that sardines are gross.” This brings to mind the true story of the collapse of the Newfoundland cod fishery. The rich cod stocks were a major reason for early European settlement of North America, and until we overfished them, they supported vibrant fishing communities for centuries. The Canadian government placed a moratorium on cod fishing in 1992, and stocks still haven’t recovered. Unlike cod, most stocks of sardines are not overfished. It’s a shame that people (in reality and in the movie) think they’re gross, because  many low trophic level fish like sardines can be extremely sustainable when consumed directly.  Also, I suppose that the ability to create any kind of food out of thin air would eliminate most of the environmental concerns associated with food production, including the sustainability of wild harvested food and the destruction of threatened habitats to create agricultural land. So that’d be a good thing.

The discovery of the foodimals in the sequel starts an important debate among the movie characters. Some foodimals are believed to represent a dangerous threat to humans, and therefore some people believe they should all be destroyed. I can’t imagine any real-life situation analogous to this, nope, nothing at all. Others point out that these creatures are unique, only found on the isolated island of Swallow Falls, and therefore should be conserved. The scientific term for a species like this is “endemic,” and many real-life isolated islands like the Galapagos or the Hawaiian islands are home to many endemic species. In fact, Swallow Falls probably had some endemic species before the non-native foodimals took over the ecosystem and displaced them.

Movie characters were concerned about the foodimals escaping their native range of Swallow Falls because they might threaten humans elsewhere, but many plant and animal species around the world are threatened by non-native species, known as invasives, taking over their habitat. One of the most famous examples of this in the ocean conservation world is the lionfish invasion. These fish are native to the Indo-Pacific, but after being released into the Caribbean about 20 years ago, they’ve spread from Massachusetts to Venezuela. Like many invasives, lionfish both eat native fishes and outcompete native fishes for the limited food resources available. The foodimals took over the Swallow Falls ecosystem in just over six months, and I shudder to think what they’d do if released onto the mainland.

So, from a conservation perspective, would the foodimals be treated as an endangered endemic species native to Swallow Falls that we need to conserve, or as a harmful invasive species that is a threat to Swallow Falls other native endemics?   Would the town of Swallow Falls be able to keep their sardine fishery in business if they marketed it as a sustainable, eco-friendly food choice? Why were most of the foodimals vegetables combined with animals, but shrimp-anzees are an animal combined with another animal?

This has been “David watches a movie but is unable to turn his conservation biologist brain off.”

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: cloudy with a chance of meatballs cloudy with a chance of meatballs 2 Conservation invasive species sardines sustainable seafood

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: There is 10,000 times more plastic in the deep sea than in surface waters.
Next Post: Middle Earth could have been saved by the Endangered Species Act ❯

You may also like

Conservation
The difference between animal welfare and animal rights
August 11, 2015
Conservation
Ethical debate: saving owls by killing owls?
February 18, 2010
Science
Reader Mail: Aquariums, seafood, and my shark documentary
March 24, 2010
Academic life
Egosystem management. Or how tantrums and unprofessional behavior are hindering conservation
September 2, 2019

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Please Help This Little Dumbo Octopus Travel Across AmericaPlease Help This Little Dumbo Octopus Travel Across AmericaAugust 3, 2026Angelo Villagomez
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
My Journey Into Researching Historical Erasure on Public LandsMy Journey Into Researching Historical Erasure on Public LandsJuly 31, 2026Angelo Villagomez
Zombie ideas in conservation: trophy hunting and conservationZombie ideas in conservation: trophy hunting and conservationAugust 6, 2026Ali Gaster
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
When universities puts $$$ before science and ethicsWhen universities puts $$$ before science and ethicsAugust 3, 2026Ali Gaster
I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.I turned my woodshop into a personal solar farm.June 21, 2021Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown