Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Tag: how many species of sharks are there

Genetics study reveals 79 potentially new species of sharks and rays: what does it mean for science and conservation?

Posted on July 3, 2012July 3, 2012 By David Shiffman 3 Comments on Genetics study reveals 79 potentially new species of sharks and rays: what does it mean for science and conservation?
Conservation, Science

When Dr. Gavin Naylor and his team started a genetic survey of existing shark and ray species, they didn’t expect the results of their project to make international news.  Their recent paper (which, at over 250 pages and complete with more than 100 figures, is nothing short of epic), however, is too striking to ignore. The results indicate that there may be as many as 79 previously unrecognized cryptic species of sharks and rays.

A cryptic species is defined as a group that looks almost exactly like another, and may even live in the same region, but is genetically distinct. We’ve known that cryptic species of sharks and rays exist for some time, such as manta rays and scalloped hammerhead sharks, but 79 is a lot; as of the paper’s publication, only 1,221 species of sharks and rays were recognized.

According to Dr. Naylor,

“Organisms become genetically differentiated over time through the cumulative effects of mutation and recombination mediated via drift and selection. When they differentiate in isolation they eventually become so different from the parental stock from which they were derived that they can no longer produce fertile offspring when crossed with them.  Some biologists use the point of reproductive inviability as the point at which new species should be recognized…..  For practical purposes we recognize “new species” as being genetically or morphologically distinctive from previously recognized forms.”

The study’s methods, though enormous in scope, were relatively basic. According to Dr. Naylor, the study utilized a technique very familiar to geneticists: “standard DNA extraction, PCR, Sanger sequencing, alignment and analysis of a protein coding mitochondrial  gene”. To achieve the goals of understanding both evolutionary relationships of sharks and rays and parasite host specificity ( where certain parasites associated only with one species), Dr. Naylor and his team obtained and analyzed samples from as many species as they could. The numbers are impressive- 56 of 57 known families of elasmobranchs were represented among the 4,283 samples from 305 species of sharks and 269 species of batoids. In other words, this study included approximately half of all known elasmobranch species, including many that had never been analyzed genetically before. Since 1986, when the project began, samples have been obtained in more than 50 countries, mostly through the team’s own field work!

Read More “Genetics study reveals 79 potentially new species of sharks and rays: what does it mean for science and conservation?” »

Shark Science Monday: Nick Dulvy talks about determining shark’s conservation status

Posted on February 21, 2011 By David Shiffman 2 Comments on Shark Science Monday: Nick Dulvy talks about determining shark’s conservation status
Conservation, Science

In this week’s edition of Shark Science Monday, Nick Dulvy, co-chair of the IUCN Shark Specialist Group, discusses how researchers determine the conservation status of shark species. If you have a question for Nick, leave it below and I’ll make sure he sees it.

Popular Posts

The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
"Why Sustainable Seafood Matters" is now available for preorder! Here's what it's about, and why I decided to write it."Why Sustainable Seafood Matters" is now available for preorder! Here's what it's about, and why I decided to write it.June 8, 2026David Shiffman
Tackling the least important debate in deep-sea mining: the desultory hyphenTackling the least important debate in deep-sea mining: the desultory hyphenJune 8, 2026Andrew Thaler
The evolution of the International Whaling Commission – from  whaling quotas to whale conservationThe evolution of the International Whaling Commission – from  whaling quotas to whale conservationJune 10, 2026Chris Parsons
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Isn’t ironic, don’t you think: dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative on World Oceans DayIsn’t ironic, don’t you think: dismantling the Ocean Observatories Initiative on World Oceans DayJune 9, 2026Southern Fried Science
Deep-sea Mining, Domestic Cats, Star Trek, and Ocean Exploration: Andrew's mid-year podcast round-up.Deep-sea Mining, Domestic Cats, Star Trek, and Ocean Exploration: Andrew's mid-year podcast round-up.June 6, 2026Andrew Thaler
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown