Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

The post-oil spill Gulf of Mexico

Posted on October 4, 2011October 4, 2011 By David Shiffman
Science

As some of you probably remember, there was an oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico last year. You can be forgiven for not remembering it, as our news media hasn’t been talking about it very much lately. In fact, if your only source of oil spill news was the mainstream media, you probably think that the Gulf is doing great! A little over a year ago, CNN ran a story about how the BP oil well that caused the spill was “effectively dead” and was “no longer a threat to the Gulf”. CNBC (and many others) ran stories about how 75 percent of the oil from the spill was gone from the Gulf. Bloomberg reported that the Gulf would recovery completely by 2012. London’s Telegraph celebrated a dramatic recovery after only one year. Whew… things aren’t as bad as we feared, and the Gulf has almost totally recovered! Or has it?

Image from GulfOilPhotos.com

As it turns out, the story isn’t quite as simple or as happy as the mainstream media would have you believe. While some aspects of the Gulf ecosystem got through the disaster relatively unscathed, others were devastated. The Gulf oyster population has decreased by almost half (BP claims that this is unrelated to the spill). Hundreds of sea turtles and thousands of sea birds were found dead as a result of the spill, which likely means that many, many more died and simply sank without being found (according to some estimates, as many as 50 times as many dead animals weren’t found as were found). Dolphins died in record numbers. Bluefin tuna, a species already threatened by rampant overfishing, were hit hard by the spill as well.  Critical species such as corals and mangroves , which provide habitat to countless species, were found dead in huge numbers.

And what about the report that 75% of the oil was “gone”? That too was incorrect. The true figure was the approximately 25% of the total oil (1/3 of the 75% that was reported as “gone”) was, in reality, dispersed. That means that it’s still there and still affecting organisms, you just can’t see it anymore. Also, the dispsersant itself can cause devastating effects that have already lasted longer than some expected. Recent storms churning up the Gulf have also revealed an enormous amount of oil, in the form of “mats”, that remains on the seafloor. In these oil mats are large numbers of dead benthic organisms. Additionally, a troubling report shows that there may still be some oil leaking from the Deepwater Horizon site.

To be sure, our worst fears weren’t realized, and we should be grateful for that. However, claims that the Gulf is totally recovered or that the oil spill is no longer affecting ecosystems there are clearly false. The BP oil spill is one of the greatest environmental disasters in history, with dramatic effects that will be felt for years to come.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: dispersant Gulf of Mexico Oil Spill

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Deep Fried Sea: The Lithodid Invasion
Next Post: It’s Not All About Carbon ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Listening for fish, glass sponges, and braking for whales: Thursday Afternoon Dredging: August 17, 2017
August 17, 2017
Weekly Salvage
Live from the International Seabed Authority, sand strikers, strange typhoons, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: February 25, 2019.
February 25, 2019
Featured
The Metals Company has a Jones Act Problem
April 2, 2025
Popular Culture
Crude Rage – A Sea in Flames reviewed
July 26, 2011

Popular Posts

What you read on Southern Fried Science in JanuaryWhat you read on Southern Fried Science in JanuaryJanuary 31, 2024Andrew Thaler
You probably don't want to work for me: What you read on Southern Fried Science in AprilYou probably don't want to work for me: What you read on Southern Fried Science in AprilApril 30, 2024Andrew Thaler
Ethical Debate: Should we have freed Willy?Ethical Debate: Should we have freed Willy?April 29, 2010David Shiffman
Playing God - How the ESA "God Squad" just voted for the extinction of a uniquely American whalePlaying God - How the ESA "God Squad" just voted for the extinction of a uniquely American whaleApril 9, 2026Southern Fried Science
Welcome stumblers, reddit-ers, and neatorama readersMay 24, 2010Andrew Thaler
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Does Shark Week portrayal of sharks matter?June 29, 2015David Shiffman
Reflections on science and my role in it, ten years since my Ph.D. defenseReflections on science and my role in it, ten years since my Ph.D. defenseApril 1, 2026David Shiffman
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
How to tell if a "shark in flooded city streets after a storm" photo is a fake in 5 easy stepsHow to tell if a "shark in flooded city streets after a storm" photo is a fake in 5 easy stepsJanuary 23, 2013David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown