Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Fun Science FRIEDay – Embryonic Gene Editing

Posted on August 18, 2017 By Kersey Sturdivant
Uncategorized

The world we currently live in would have seemed like science fiction to humans in the not to distant past. Everyday more and advancements transform sci-fi dreams into reality. Most recently gene editing of human embryos has been birthed into the realm of possibility (cheesy pun intended!). In theory gene editing embryos could allow you to choose preferential traits in your soon to be human flesh-blob. That level of ability does not currently exist, but the latest developments in gene editing are still pretty astonishing.

Eggs before gene editing (left), and eggs after gene editing and already undergoing cell division (right)
(Photo credit: Ma et al. 2017)

In a recent study scientists took a human embryo and edited a dangerous mutation from the genes of that embryo; human reality, meet science fiction. Scientists at Oregon Health and Science University, with colleagues in California, China and South Korea, edited embryos, fixing a mutation that causes a common heart condition that can lead to sudden death later in life. The biggest hurdles were producing embryos in which all cells, not just some, were mutation-free, while also avoiding creating unwanted extra mutations during the process. The researchers found that when gene-editing components were introduced with sperm to the egg before fertilization, the success of the process was markedly different from previous approaches. If embryos with the repaired mutation were allowed to develop into babies, they would not only be disease-free but would also not transmit the disease to their descendants.

Molecular DNA
(Photo credit: SNRE Lab/Flickr)

There are A LOT of moral and ethical implications around gene editing embryos, with many unforeseen medical consequences of making inherited changes to human DNA. There are also cultural implications as gene engineering could lead to another form of eugenics, where those with the means to confer preferable traits to their offspring exclusively benefit from this technology. Attempts have been made to establish regulations and boundaries to the application of gene editing. An influential science advisory group formed by the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Medicine has strongly urged that this technology only be used for dire medical problems.

Only time will tell the effectiveness of gene editing regulation. For now these recent advancements in embryonic gene editing open up a world of possibilities, and push human technological ability into the realm of the remarkable and somewhat unbelievable.

You can read the full article of this recent work published in the journal Nature.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: dna DNA (DEOXYRIBONUCLEIC ACID) DNA editing embryo molecular ecology molecular therapy

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: There’s only one way to get these exclusive, limited-edition Jaunty Ocean Critter stickers!
Next Post: Unflappable Mola Molas, a Cousteau biopic, sharkcats, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: August 21, 2017 ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Fun Science FRIEDay – Cure for HIV?
May 19, 2017
Science
Hatteras to Sargasso
May 20, 2010
Science
The moldy kingdom gets a new neighbor
May 13, 2011
Uncategorized
Ethical debate: Patient consent and medical progress
February 10, 2010

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Save the seals.  Congress is trying to shoot its way to salmon recoverySave the seals.  Congress is trying to shoot its way to salmon recoveryJuly 22, 2026Southern Fried Science
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)Our favorite sea monsters – Ningen (#4)September 7, 2010Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
The “Conservation Paywall”: why saving the planet has become a luxury sportThe “Conservation Paywall”: why saving the planet has become a luxury sportJuly 23, 2026Chris Parsons
The story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageThe story of the pride flag made from NASA imagery: Bluesky's most-liked imageSeptember 27, 2024David Shiffman
First, do no harm.  First, do no harm.  July 17, 2026Southern Fried Science
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown