Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Robots Versus Aliens – Anticipatory conservation in technology-drive initiatives

Posted on September 30, 2015September 29, 2015 By Andrew Thaler
Conservation, Science

This week, I and a team of marine ecologist, explorers, and ocean technologists published Robots as vectors for marine invasions: best practices for minimizing transmission of invasive species via observation-class ROVs. This paper, conceived and largely produced during the ROV2PNG Marine Science Short Course in Papua New Guinea, represent the current best practices for minimizing or eliminating the spread of invasive species via portable, low-cost underwater robots.

Zebra mussels observed via OpenROV. Photo by author.
Zebra mussels observed via OpenROV. Photo by author.

Species invasion, particularly in the ocean, is a huge problem. Invasive species are ruthlessly good at out-competing native fauna. Without any natural predators, they can flourish, causing massive, irreparable damage to marine ecosystems. As scientists, explorers, and conservationist, we have to be proactive in ensuring that our actions don’t negatively impact the ecosystems we’re trying to save. Our guidelines are simple, but effective, and, most importantly, easy to follow.

  1. Educate yourself about species invasions generally and specifically about current issues in the area you’re working.
  2. Inspect your gear.
  3. Soak your gear in freshwater between dives.
  4. Soak your gear in weak bleach between expeditions.
  5. Avoid moving your equipment between geographic regions, when possible.

Technology can be a powerful tool in the aid of conservation. Around the world, people are using low-cost robotics to count elephants, detect poachers, protect tortoises, even seek-and-destroy invasive sea stars. As I discuss over at Motherboard, these robots are a transformative component of 21st century marine science and conservation, they fundamentally reshape the way we interact with the ocean. And with the explosive success of the latest OpenROV launch, there are about to be a lot more robots in the water. This is a good thing. The more eyes we have in the sea, the more people that actively contribute to ocean exploration, the more people with access to the tools necessary to explore, study, and understand our oceans and how they are changing, the better off we will all be.

Technology comes at a cost, and it is often an environmental one. We pull rare and precious metals from the earth in order to fabricate these amazing machines. We burn ancient carbon to power this world. We fabricate more and more plastic, a material designed to last forever that is often used once, then discarded. More directly, we create great chains of social connective tissue that link the world together, both physically and electronically.

I want to connect humans to the ocean through underwater robots that are cheap, capable, and easy to use. Every new connection creates a new vector for species invasion.

Robots as vectors for marine invasions is the first peer-reviewed scientific publication to use the OpenROV as its foundation. This is important. In the increasingly technology-driven conservation initiative of the 21st century, we need to take an anticipatory, rather than reactionary approach to the potential impacts of new technology. If the story of the last century of conservation is about reacting to the damage caused by human advancement, the next century must be about harnessing our collective experience to anticipate the potential impacts that new methods, new technologies, and even entirely new industries will have on the environment. We should prepare for, rather than react to, environmental harm.

We recognized early on that the one of the greatest assets of the OpenROV, it’s portability, is also it’s greatest potential for environmental harm. A carelessly packed ROV could carry invasive species around the world. So we present these guidelines, not as a response to any incident, but in anticipation of this potential, and an attempt to minimize that possibility. It is my hope that, by setting the precedent early, we can more fully harness the vast capabilities that these robots offer while minimizing the potential for environmental harm.

Call to Action

If you’re a microROV user, whether OpenROV, Fathom, VideoRay, or any of myriad observation-class options, follow these guidelines, incorporate them into your training, add them to your pre- and post-dive checklists.

If you’re an NGO, government agency, academic institution, or other organization using microROVs in any capacity, require your employees to adhere to these guidelines.

If you’re a reviewer, editor, or publisher of scientific manuscripts, require that any papers that use microROV explicitly state that they have adhered to these guidelines.

If you’re a manufacture of microROVs, include these guidelines in information packets shipped out with new microROVs.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: invasive species OpenROV

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Polar bear feast on seabird eggs is reason we can’t have nice things
Next Post: Fun Science FRIEDay – Dude, I’m Glowing! ❯

You may also like

Uncategorized
Watch Blue Pints Episode 5: 2012 in review, what’s in store for 2013
January 4, 2013
Education
Dive the Wreck of the Steamship Tahoe with OpenROV!
June 6, 2016
Weekly Salvage
See a Great White Shark from the inside with OpenROV, Vaquita, Narwhals, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: November 6, 2017
November 6, 2017
Science
Six new robots join Papua New Guinea’s marine science assets: an update from #ROV2PNG
November 7, 2014

Popular Posts

Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.December 1, 2025David Shiffman
Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.December 3, 2025Andrew Thaler
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.November 20, 2025Andrew Thaler
2025: My year in writing, public speaking, and media interviews2025: My year in writing, public speaking, and media interviewsDecember 3, 2025David Shiffman
The Trouble with Teacup PigsThe Trouble with Teacup PigsOctober 14, 2012Andrew Thaler
Urea and Shark OsmoregulationUrea and Shark OsmoregulationNovember 15, 2010David Shiffman
How tiny satellites are tracking marine wildlifeDecember 1, 2025Andrew Thaler
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Quick Tips for Graduate Student Life - Write a Book ReviewJanuary 23, 2014Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown