Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Two Years of Deep-sea Mining in Review: A 3-decade-long disturbance study on the deep abyssal plain.

Posted on March 17, 2022March 17, 2022 By Andrew Thaler
Science

As in-person negotiations on the future of exploitation in the deep ocean resume this week in Kingston Jamaica, we reflect back on the last two years of development as reported on our sister site, the Deep-sea Mining Observer. This article first appeared on May 22, 2020.


In the late 1980s, as the first wave of deep-sea mining exploration approached a decade of hibernation, researchers launched an ambitious experiment to understand the long-term environmental impact of harvesting polymetallic nodules from the abyssal plain. The Disturbance and recolonization experiment in a manganese nodule area of the deep South Pacific (DISCOL) remains the most ambitious attempt to understand how nodule extraction affects deep ocean ecosystems. Though interest (and funding) waxed and waned with the prevailing interest in deep-sea mining, now, more than 30 years later, DISCOL provides the only large, multi-decade impact study from which contractors, regulators, and environmental advocacy groups can draw inferences about the recovery and resilience of deep-sea ecosystems following mining-induced disturbances throughout the lifetime of an ISA-issued mining exploration or exploitation lease. 

The 1980s saw a surge in interest for deep-sea mining. The successful early campaigns of the late 1970s, bolstered by CIA funding for Project Azorian, presented a future of seemingly limitless profit scattered across the seafloor. That the early financial projections were supported by covert government funding was not yet widely known, and, even for those who were privy to the operation, regardless of initial funding the value had been established, the ship built, the technology sea-trialed. The profit potential was there. What was still tabula rasa was the environmental consequences of extraction on an almost completely unknown ecosystem.

Location of DISCOL, courtesy https://www.discol.de/discol-/-atesepp.

DISCOL built upon two earlier, smaller deep-sea disturbance studies, one carried out in the eastern Pacific and another in the Red Sea. Located in the Peru Basin just south of the equator off the coast of Peru, DISCOL is situated in a region rich in polymetallic nodules. Initially funded by the Republic of Germany, four cruises were conducted between 1988 and 1996 to assess impacts. Following a major effort to analyze the results of those four cruises, which concluded in 2001, the project went dormant until it was revived under the European JPI Oceans framework in 2015. Since then, an additional two research cruises have sampled and surveyed the DISCOL Experimental Area. 

The DISCOL Experimental Area was disturbed using a plough-harrow — a custom device that was dragged across the seafloor, burying polymetallic nodules and creating 8-meter wide troughs of intense disturbance. Rather than conventional straight transects, the DISCOL tracks were ploughed radially, creating a circle of impact in which the areas towards the inner circle were more disturbed while the outer rings were relatively less disturbed. In total, 78 plough-harrow rings were cut into the seafloor. Instead of collecting nodules, the plough-harrow buried them, simulating their removal without actually harvesting them from the seafloor. Following those first passes, few nodules were observed within the disturbance area, megafaunal communities were reported as “destroyed”, and the telltale evidence of a sediment plume extended outward, beyond the disturbed region. 

The first major deep-sea mining impact experiment was underway. 

Follow-up cruises were conducted in 1989, 1992, and 1996. During these cruises they characterized faunal recovery across a variety of characteristics which were broadly classified into four tiers: 

  1. Undisturbed. “Undisturbed areas found within the DEA and outside the experimental area, characterized by different manganese nodule densities.”
  2. Apparently Disturbed. “Areas within the DEA not directly influenced by the disturber, but showing different degrees of re-sedimentation and sediment coverage on the manganese nodules.” 
  3. Partially Disturbed. “Areas immediately adjacent to the disturbed area. The upper sediment layers are compressed laterally and heaped up by the “plough-harrow” activity. The manganese nodules are heavily covered with sediment. The transition to undisturbed or apparently undisturbed area is gradual.”
  4. Disturbed. “Areas directly influenced by the “plough-harrow”. The sediment is disrupted and may be covered with a thin layer of resettled sediment. Only a few manganese nodules are not buried.”

Interest in deep-sea mining was already beginning to fade when the final DISCOL cruise left port. The price of manganese and other metals was falling, major technological promises had failed to come to fruition, and the Glomar Challenger, itself a relic of the industry’s clandestine legacy, looked less like a symbol of a prosperous deep ocean future and more like an aging cast off from the Cold War. 

DISCOL would sit, undisturbed for another 15 years. A new surge in interest for deep-ocean minerals, spurred by the boom in renewable technology and a massive new demand in next-generation battery materials, brought the industry back to the forefront. As new contractors began obtaining new lease blocks and exploration permits, the fundamental question of deep-sea mining–what is the environmental harm?–gained new urgency. Under the JPI Oceans framework, two new research cruises set sail to examine the DISCOL Experimental Area 26 years after the RV Sonne first dragged a plough-harrow across the abyssal plain. 

Over the last few years, numerous studies have resulted from those cruises looking at the long term potential for seafloor recovery (or not) following extensive mining. Earlier this year we reported on a comprehensive study looking at megafauna, which demonstrated that many benthic filter feeders showed no sign of recovery even after 26 years, while mobile scavengers were returning, but the community composition was different from pre-disturbance communities, suggesting that changes to the immediate benthic ecosystem following mining may be dramatic and irreversible on a decadal time scale.

Microbes at the experimental mining site, however, have been much less thoroughly studied. Recent research has pointed to the importance of microbial systems in the deep sea for regulating carbon capture and facilitating biomass transport. In the most recent study to examine the impacts of simulated mining at DISCOL, researchers from Germany reported that, even 26 years later, microbial communities within the plough-harrow tracks had only partially recovered and that full recovery could be on the order of 50 years to return to pre-disturbance levels. 

The DISCOL experiment was a visionary attempt to quantify the impacts of polymetallic nodule mining on the seafloor and continues to serve as the best model system for understanding environmental impacts. As the deep-sea mining industry inches towards production, having a 30-year head start on understanding what recovery looks like following a mining event will prove invaluable to future management and mitigation plans. 


Featured Image: disturbed areas, courtesy DISCOL: https://www.discol.de/initial-impact-study

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: deep-sea mining DISCOL

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Two Years of Deep-sea Mining in Review: Confusion and Gridlock at the 26th Session of the International Seabed Authority
Next Post: Two Years of Deep-sea Mining in Review: The Precarious Partnership Between Deep-sea Mining Contractors and Environmental NGOs ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Fish feel pain, mining feels the pressure, sea lions feel excluded, and science publishing feels like an old boys club. It’s the Monday Morning Salvage: January 8, 2018!
January 8, 2018
Weekly Salvage
A brutal slog through some of the worst ocean and climate news of the summer. Also, fish cannons. [Tuesday] Morning Salvage: August 13, 2019.
August 13, 2019
Weekly Salvage
Hagfish, chill Puffins, swamp monsters, the mining boat floats, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: April 2, 2018
April 2, 2018
Conservation
A big-hearted iron snail is the first deep-sea species to be declared endangered due to seabed mining.
July 22, 2019

Popular Posts

I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.I can serve on your graduate thesis committee. Here’s what you can expect of me, and what I expect in return.October 16, 2025David Shiffman
Marine Biology Career AdviceMarine Biology Career AdviceMay 30, 2025David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?March 29, 2011David Shiffman
Florida angler catches (and likely kills) Endangered great hammerhead sharkFlorida angler catches (and likely kills) Endangered great hammerhead sharkFebruary 13, 2012David Shiffman
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Walking Backwards Into the Future: Applying Indigenous Knowledge to Deep Sea MiningWalking Backwards Into the Future: Applying Indigenous Knowledge to Deep Sea MiningFebruary 5, 2026Angelo Villagomez
Full video of injured shark shows numerous natural injuriesFull video of injured shark shows numerous natural injuriesMay 3, 2011David Shiffman
What does the new species of hammerhead mean for shark science and conservation?What does the new species of hammerhead mean for shark science and conservation?November 11, 2013David Shiffman
I'm getting married! Want to honor us? Here are some great charities you can donate to.I'm getting married! Want to honor us? Here are some great charities you can donate to.January 23, 2026David Shiffman
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown