Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross

Posted on March 18, 2010 By Andrew Thaler 4 Comments on Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross
Science

If you’re still unconvinced by previous meditations into the sub-par-ody of sharks, consider this study, reported over at Laelaps:

The simplest explanation was that the shark (or sharks) which left the marks had been intentionally trying to eat the feces. “From the curvature of the toothmarks and their positions on the specimens,” Godfrey and Smith write, “we reason that the majority of the fecal masses were in the sharks’ mouths.”

via Laelaps

Yup, David’s legendary ancient sharks ate poo.

~Southern Fried Scientist

Godfrey, S., & Smith, J. (2010). Shark-bitten vertebrate coprolites from the Miocene of Maryland Naturwissenschaften DOI: 10.1007/s00114-010-0659-x

*The preceding post has absolutely nothing to do with shark conservation.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: Chordata Dermata Dentata Regatta poop

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Bluefin tuna fails to make UN’s list of protected fish
Next Post: CITES update: Bluefin and crocodiles and polar bears? Oh my! ❯

You may also like

Science
10 things I hate about sharks
March 14, 2010
Weekly Salvage
Unprecedented destruction in the deep Gulf of Mexico, The Ocean Cleanup’s River Pivot, and More! Weekly Salvage: October 28, 2019.
October 28, 2019
Weekly Salvage
See a Great White Shark from the inside with OpenROV, Vaquita, Narwhals, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: November 6, 2017
November 6, 2017
Weekly Salvage
Meet me in Borneo, exploitation on the high seas, navy sonars, creature reports, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: March 12, 2018.
March 12, 2018

4 thoughts on “Ancient sharks, not only sub-par, but also pretty gross”

  1. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 18, 2010 at 10:58 pm

    I might suggest reading the Laelaps article further. The very next sentences after the one you posted:

    “Yet, strangely, the coprolites were not ingested. Even though tiger sharks have often been cast as indiscriminate when it comes to food there has been no indication that they have ever deliberately eaten feces, and so the authors looked for a different explanation…The shark could have left impressions of the feces inside the crocodile during this stage of the attack or after the viscera of the crocodile had become exposed…The pattern of the bite marks and the fact that the feces were not ingested is consistent with a reconstruction in which, during an attack on another animal, the shark either bit through the body wall and guts to leave the tooth impressions or bit the intestines after disemboweling its prey. Such an attack would have left tooth marks on the feces, which probably fell out of the intestine shortly afterward, hence “In this scenario, the shark chose not to eat the feces, which drifted away, settled out of sight, or otherwise avoided attention.”

  2. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 19, 2010 at 7:23 am

    While your facts are all completely correct, I totally disagree with your conclusions. Anthropogenic Global Warming is real and there is no serious debate among climate scientists.

  3. WhySharksMatter says:
    March 19, 2010 at 9:14 am

    Also, though sharks aren’t doing it, eating poop is ecologically important. There have been animals around for a few hundred million years at this point, and I for one don’t want to live in a world that’s covered in poop.

  4. Southern Fried Scientist says:
    March 19, 2010 at 9:21 am

    Anthropogenic Global Warming is real, Dave.

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Tangier, an Island out of Time.Tangier, an Island out of Time.July 3, 2017Andrew Thaler
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
How close did the world's first deep-sea mining come to the dredging the world's largest cold-water coral reef?How close did the world's first deep-sea mining come to the dredging the world's largest cold-water coral reef?March 17, 2026Andrew Thaler
Urea and Shark OsmoregulationUrea and Shark OsmoregulationNovember 15, 2010David Shiffman
Shark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryShark of Darkness: Wrath of Submarine is a fake documentaryAugust 10, 2014Michelle Jewell
Join Me at Upwell: A Wave of Ocean Justice — Our Fourth Year!Join Me at Upwell: A Wave of Ocean Justice — Our Fourth Year!March 24, 2026Angelo Villagomez
Alberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetAlberta, Canada is the proud owner of the largest man-made pyramid on the planetOctober 16, 2012Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Build a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseBuild a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseJuly 21, 2015Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown