Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.

Posted on December 8, 2011 By Andrew Thaler 1 Comment on Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.
Science

Yesterday the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) released their new scientific integrity policy, which specifically states that:

“To support a culture of openness, one of the policy’s key provisions affirms unequivocally that NOAA scientists may speak freely with the media and public about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.”

source

This new policy is a major step forward for government transparency and promotes the free and open exchange of knowledge among scientists in a public forum. Well done, NOAA.

Are you a NOAA scientist with something to get off you chest? Maybe you’d just like voice your support (or disdain) for the new integrity policy? Or perhaps you’d like to test the waters with an innocuous, but unsupervised, public statement? Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.

Share this:

  • Share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: NOAA scientific integrity

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Better Conservation through Cloning: this cock doesn’t crow
Next Post: The Birth of Sustainability Science ❯

You may also like

Weekly Salvage
Blending smartphones for science, understanding the environmental hazards of 3D printing, flooding the midwest, and ocean news, too! Monday Morning Salvage: March 25, 2019
March 25, 2019
environmental protection agency
Welcome back, U.S. government science and environment agencies!
October 17, 2013
Conservation
Beaufort NOAA Lab Builds Community: It would be a huge loss to say goodbye
March 27, 2014
Weekly Salvage
Hagfish nom-nommers, Trample-gramming, boring clams, I’m still in love with these giant isopods, and more! Monday Morning Salvage: April 8, 2019.
April 8, 2019

One thought on “Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.”

  1. Patric Douglas says:
    December 8, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    Ummm, in regards to this statement, “Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.”

    May I refer you to the definition of an “Anarchist” which surprisingly has roots in your statement:

    Anarchist Definition
    an·ar·chist
    noun

    1.a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.

    2.a person who seeks to overturn by all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, like NOAA, which prides itself in lock step Pavlovian behavior from it’s overworked/underpaid/unappreciated scientists and field researchers.

    3.a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom. Used in a statement, “Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.”

    Let anarchy reign and let the NOAA research community speak, but just in case, you may want to assign nom de plumes for each, lest The Long Horny Hand of Lubchenco reach out to establish order in this online Madras of Anarchy you set loose here.

    Happy Holidays!

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

At least 74 practicing shark researchers: How a silly thing I said online raised thousands for conservationAt least 74 practicing shark researchers: How a silly thing I said online raised thousands for conservationFebruary 26, 2025David Shiffman
Why the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesWhy the new Trump order to shoot wolves is both illegal and a dreadful precedent for endangered speciesSeptember 5, 2026Ali Gaster
Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?Severely injured great white shark found, are scientists responsible?March 29, 2011David Shiffman
5 things I learned helping to reassess the global conservation status of every species of tuna and billfish5 things I learned helping to reassess the global conservation status of every species of tuna and billfishSeptember 15, 2026David Shiffman
That's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopThat's not a blobfish: Deep Sea Social Media is Flooded by AI SlopDecember 19, 2025Andrew Thaler
Getting a sense of porpoiseJanuary 20, 2009Andrew Thaler
How to build a canoe from scratch on a graduate student stipendHow to build a canoe from scratch on a graduate student stipendApril 17, 2010Andrew Thaler
13 wrong things about sharks that conservation advocates should stop saying in 2013 (and what they should say instead)December 27, 2012David Shiffman
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
The Trump Administration’s latest attack on endangered speciesThe Trump Administration’s latest attack on endangered speciesSeptember 17, 2026Ali Gaster
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2026 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown