Skip to content

Southern Fried Science

Over 15 years of ocean science and conservation online

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS

Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.

Posted on December 8, 2011 By Andrew Thaler 1 Comment on Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.
Science

Yesterday the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) released their new scientific integrity policy, which specifically states that:

“To support a culture of openness, one of the policy’s key provisions affirms unequivocally that NOAA scientists may speak freely with the media and public about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.”

source

This new policy is a major step forward for government transparency and promotes the free and open exchange of knowledge among scientists in a public forum. Well done, NOAA.

Are you a NOAA scientist with something to get off you chest? Maybe you’d just like voice your support (or disdain) for the new integrity policy? Or perhaps you’d like to test the waters with an innocuous, but unsupervised, public statement? Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Bluesky (Opens in new window) Bluesky
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to share on Threads (Opens in new window) Threads
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Click to share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon

Related

Tags: NOAA scientific integrity

Post navigation

❮ Previous Post: Better Conservation through Cloning: this cock doesn’t crow
Next Post: The Birth of Sustainability Science ❯

You may also like

News
Tear gassing fish, new NOAA chief, and Facebook’s flop – What’s Up With the Oceans this Week?
September 23, 2020
Weekly Salvage
Eat hagfish, work at LUMCON, clone Vaquita, question floating trash collectors, and more! Monday Morning Mega-Salvage: August 13, 2018
August 13, 2018
Uncategorized
Obama’s ocean monuments, deep diving seals, and sustainable US fisheries: Thursday Afternoon Dredging, May 24th, 2018
May 24, 2018
Conservation
Fun Science FRIEDay – The worlds largest sponge.
June 3, 2016

One thought on “Open thread for NOAA scientists to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on their official work without approval from the public affairs office or their supervisors.”

  1. Patric Douglas says:
    December 8, 2011 at 6:04 pm

    Ummm, in regards to this statement, “Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.”

    May I refer you to the definition of an “Anarchist” which surprisingly has roots in your statement:

    Anarchist Definition
    an·ar·chist
    noun

    1.a person who advocates or believes in anarchy or anarchism.

    2.a person who seeks to overturn by all constituted forms and institutions of society and government, like NOAA, which prides itself in lock step Pavlovian behavior from it’s overworked/underpaid/unappreciated scientists and field researchers.

    3.a person who promotes disorder or excites revolt against any established rule, law, or custom. Used in a statement, “Please use the comment thread of this (or any other) post as an open forum for you to speak freely about scientific and technical matters based on your official work without approval from the public affairs office or your supervisors.”

    Let anarchy reign and let the NOAA research community speak, but just in case, you may want to assign nom de plumes for each, lest The Long Horny Hand of Lubchenco reach out to establish order in this online Madras of Anarchy you set loose here.

    Happy Holidays!

Comments are closed.

Popular Posts

Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.Shark scientists want their research to help save threatened species, but don’t know how. Our new paper can help.December 1, 2025David Shiffman
What Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryWhat Ocean Ramsey does is not shark science or conservation: some brief thoughts on "the Shark Whisperer" documentaryJuly 2, 2025David Shiffman
Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.Norway and Cook Islands put their deep-sea mining plans on pause.December 3, 2025Andrew Thaler
What is a Sand Shark?What is a Sand Shark?November 12, 2017Chuck Bangley
Mermaids: The New Evidence is a Fake DocumentaryMermaids: The New Evidence is a Fake DocumentaryMay 28, 2013Andrew Thaler
What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.What we know we don't know: impacts of deep-sea mining on whales, dolphins, sharks, turtles, and other migratory species.November 20, 2025Andrew Thaler
What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?What can the funniest shark memes on the internetz teach us about ocean science and conservation?November 8, 2013David Shiffman
10 fish weirder than the fish in the 10 weirdest fish in the world list10 fish weirder than the fish in the 10 weirdest fish in the world listDecember 18, 2013Guest Writer
Breaking News! "Most Comprehensive Estimate of Mortality": Between 63 and 273 Million Sharks Killed Each YearBreaking News! "Most Comprehensive Estimate of Mortality": Between 63 and 273 Million Sharks Killed Each YearMarch 1, 2013David Shiffman
Build a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseBuild a dirt cheap, tough-as-nails field computer in a Pelican caseJuly 21, 2015Andrew Thaler
Subscribe to our RSS Feed for updates whenever new articles are published.

We recommend Feedly for RSS management. It's like Google Reader, except it still exists.

Southern Fried Science

  • Home
  • About SFS
  • Authors
  • Support SFS


If you enjoy Southern Fried Science, consider contributing to our Patreon campaign.

Copyright © 2025 Southern Fried Science.

Theme: Oceanly Premium by ScriptsTown